<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dr Billy Health</title>
	<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Ideas and Insights to Our Health</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Buy, Buy American Pie</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03112010/buy-buy-american-pie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03112010/buy-buy-american-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consider This]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03112010/buy-buy-american-pie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uncle Sam points out the problems we have when we buy cheap products from China. &#8220;Buy, Buy American Pie&#8221; was written and performed by the Capitol Steps. Visit them at www.CapSteps.com This is a parody and involves exageration. Tastykakes are made in the United States and not in China and definitely contain no harmful ingredients. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle Sam points out the problems we have when we buy cheap products from China. &#8220;Buy, Buy American Pie&#8221; was written and performed by the Capitol Steps. Visit them at www.CapSteps.com This is a parody and involves exageration. Tastykakes are made in the United States and not in China and definitely contain no harmful ingredients. Visit www.Tastykake.Com. Little Debbie is also located in the United States and not in China and their products contain no harmful ingredients. Visit www.LittleDebbie.Com.</p>
<p>Ten REAL reasons to avoid products made in China: 1. Products made with hazardous materials 2. Lack of quality control, monitoring, and safety regulations, plus corruption 3. Tainted food, deadly drugs, adulterated products 4. High levels of antibiotics and toxins in seafood 5. Exploitation of the Chinese workforce and use of child labor 6. Predatory pricing and unethical business practices 7. Massive industrialization at the expense of the environment 8. Deforestation and mining has destroyed the water supply in Asia 9. Chinese military manufactured goods 10. Manufacturing in forced (laogai) labor camps and prisons&#8230;</p>
<object width="640" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Vq8wbXAR4ZQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Vq8wbXAR4ZQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03112010/buy-buy-american-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear mishaps, A short list&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Alerts!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nuclear mishaps, A short list of some of the known OOPSES that are not supposed to happen… Or we’re not supposed to know about:
February 16, 2009
A cross-channel investigation has been launched after two submarines carrying nuclear weapons – from the Royal and French navies – collided in the Atlantic.
HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant crashed on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list of some of the known OOPSES that are not supposed to happen… Or we’re not supposed to know about:</p>
<p>February 16, 2009<br />
A cross-channel investigation has been launched after two submarines carrying nuclear weapons – from the Royal and French navies – collided in the Atlantic.<br />
HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant crashed on February 3 or 4, despite both vessels being equipped with sonar.<br />
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5744071.ece<br />
`<br />
Russian nuclear submarine accidents<br />
MOSCOW (AP) — Russian and Soviet nuclear submarines have been involved in numerous accidents during the past four decades. Poor maintenance and economic troubles since the 1991 Soviet collapse have further aggravated the problem. </p>
<p>    More coverage </p>
<p>Here is a look at some of the more serious incidents:<br />
 Jan. 26, 1998. An accident aboard a nuclear-powered submarine at an Arctic base in Listafjord, on Russia&#8217;s Kola Peninsula, released toxic fumes that killed a Russian naval officer and injured four sailors. There was no radiation leak.</p>
<p> Oct. 17, 1996. A nuclear submarine on patrol in the Pacific took on water after one of its propellers broke. No one was reported injured and the sub returned safely to base. </p>
<p> September 1995. A power cutoff to nuclear submarines on the coast of northern Russia caused a cooling system on one boat to break down, forcing emergency measures to stop its reactor from overheating. </p>
<p> March 23, 1994. Two Russian submarines with nuclear weapons on board grazed each other during an exercise in the Barents Sea. </p>
<p> Summer 1993. An accident in a nuclear submarine killed 21 sailors and injured two more, but navy commanders tried to cover it up. </p>
<p> November 1992. A Russian nuclear submarine caught fire while under repair in the Arctic port of Murmansk. </p>
<p> June, 1992. An explosion aboard a nuclear submarine killed an officer and injured four crewmen while the ship was being repaired on the Kola Peninsula in northern Russia.</p>
<p> April 1989. A Soviet nuclear submarine, the Komsomolets, sank in the Barents Sea, killing 42 of the 69 sailors aboard.</p>
<p> October 1986. A nuclear-armed submarine caught fire and sank 600 miles east of Bermuda. A top Russian scientist said much later that nuclear warheads on the sub broke open, spewing plutonium-239 into the Atlantic.</p>
<p> Between 1956 and 1991, there were at least 121 incidents or accidents in the Soviet nuclear submarine fleet, according to a 1992 study by the environmental group Greenpeace.<br />
At least 10 accidents involved serious damage and danger to nuclear reactors, and actual reactor meltdowns occurred twice, in 1979 and 1985, another Greenpeace study said. </p>
<p>http://www.usatoday.com/news/nds25.htm<br />
`</p>
<p>U.S. Nuclear Accidents<br />
Compiled by allen lutins (allen@lutins.org)<br />
Last updated 20 December 2009<br />
Copyright © 2009. Click here for information about reproducing this article. </p>
<p>________________________________________<br />
Introduction<br />
The following is a compilation of some known events involving nuclear devices and facilities under U.S. jurisdiction, many involving fatalities. Note that this work is NOT an anti-nuclear diatribe, but rather an encyclopedic listing of facts pertaining to a particular topic; I am well aware of the dangers and negative ecological consequences of alternate energy forms (especially coal and petroleum-based fuels), but a discussion of those is beyond the subject matter of this page.<br />
Please DO NOT mail me with requests for additional information; all that i know about this subject is presented on this page, and i regret that i am unable to assist the internet community with additional information on this topic. More information along these lines is available at the following:<br />
Criticality Accidents (Trinity Atomic Web Site): www.cddc.vt.edu/host/atomic/accident/critical.html<br />
Government Accountability Project&#8217;s Nuclear Oversight page: www.whistleblower.org/template/page.cfm?page_id=10<br />
Radioactive America: www.cdi.org/adm/1341/<br />
Nuclear Information and Resource Service: www.nirs.org<br />
U.S. Nuclear Weapons Accidents: www.cdi.org/issues/nukeaccidents/accidents.htm<br />
If you can document items which i&#8217;ve yet to include, or have corrections or comments regarding this page, please send them to me.<br />
________________________________________<br />
Contents<br />
Research Facilities<br />
Power Plants<br />
Bombs and Bombers<br />
Submarines and Ships<br />
Nuclear Bomb Tests and Testing Facilities<br />
Processing, Storage, Shipping, and Disposal<br />
________________________________________<br />
Research Facilities<br />
29 November 1955<br />
Experimental breeder reactor EBR-1 experienced a core meltdown due to operator error.<br />
26 July 1959<br />
A clogged coolant channel resulted in a 30% reactor core meltdown at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (now known as the Boeing-Rocketdyne Nuclear Facility) in the Simi Hills area of Ventura County, California. Later discovery of the incident prompted a class-action suit by local residents, who successfully sued for $30 million over cancer and thyroid abnormalities contracted due to their proximity to the facility.<br />
2 September 1944<br />
Peter Bragg and Douglas Paul Meigs, two Manhattan Project chemists, were killed when their attempt to unclog a tube in a uranium enrichment device led to an explosion of radioactive uranium hexafluoride gas exploded at the Naval Research Laboratory in Philadelphia, PA. The explosion ruptured nearby steam pipes, leading to a gas and steam combination that bathed the men in a scalding, radioactive, acidic cloud of gas which killed them a short while later.<br />
21 August 1945<br />
Harry K. Daghlian Jr. was killed during the final stages of the Manhattan Project (undertaken at Los Alamos, New Mexico to develop the first atomic bomb) from a radiation burst released when a critical assembly of fissile material was accidentally brought together by hand. This incident pre-dated remote-control assembly of such components, but the hazards of manual assembly were known at the time (the accident occurred during a procedure known as &#8220;tickling the dragon&#8217;s tail&#8221;). A similar incident, involving another fatality, occurred the following year (see next entry), after which hand-maniuplations of critical assemblies was abandoned.<br />
21 May 1946<br />
A nuclear criticality accident occured at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory in New Mexico. Eight people were exposed to radiation, and one, Louis Slotin, died nine days later later of acute radiation sickness.<br />
2 July 1956<br />
Nine persons were injured when two explosions destroyed a portion of Sylvania Electric Products&#8217; Metallurgy Atomic Research Center in Bayside, Queens, New York.<br />
1957<br />
A radiation release at the the Keleket company resulted in a five-month decontamination at a cost of $250,000. A capsule of radium salt (used for calibrating the radiation-measuring devices produced there) burst, contaminating the building for a full five months.<br />
30 December 1958<br />
A chemical operator was exposed to a lethal dose of radiation following an incident involving the mixing of plutonium solutions, dying 35 hours later of severe radiation exposure.<br />
1959<br />
A partial sodium reactor meltdown occurred at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory in Simi Valley Hills, California.<br />
2 April 1962<br />
An &#8220;unplanned nuclear excursion&#8221; occurred in a plutonium processing facility in Richland, Washington. Several employees were hospitalized for observation following exposure to the resultant radiation, and radiation was detected in the surrounding atmosphere for sevearl days following the incident.<br />
26 March 1963<br />
A mechanical failure led to a nuclear leak and subsequent fire at an experimental facility in Livermore, California, resulting in serious damage to the shielded vault where the experiment was conducted.<br />
5 October 1966<br />
A sodium cooling system malfunction caused a partial core meltdown at Detroit Edison&#8217;s Enrico Fermi I demonstration breeder reactor near Detroit, Michigan. Radioactive gases leaked into the containment structures, but radiation was reportedly contained.<br />
1974<br />
Whistleblowers at the Isomedix company in New Jersey reported that radioactive water was flushed down toilets and had contaminated pipes leading to sewers. The same year a worker received a dose of radiation considered lethal, but was saved by prompt hospital treatment.<br />
1982<br />
International Nutronics in Dover, New Jersey, which used radiation baths to purify gems, chemicals, food, and medical supplies, experienced an accident that completely contaminated the plant, forcing its closure. A pump malfunctioned, siphoning water from the baths onto the floor; the water eventually was drained into the sewer system of the heavily populated town of Dover. The NRC wasn&#8217;t informed of the accident until ten months later &#8212; and then by a whistleblower, not the company. In 1986, the company and one of its top executives were convicted by a federal jury of conspiracy and fraud. Radiation has been detected in the vicinity of the plant, but the NRC claims the levels &#8220;aren&#8217;t hazardous.&#8221;<br />
1986<br />
The NRC revoked the license of a Radiation Technology, Inc. (RTI) plant in New Jersey for repeated worker safety violations. RTI was cited 32 times for various violations, including throwing radioactive garbage out with the regular trash. The most serious violation was bypassing a safety device to prevent people from entering the irradiation chamber during operation, resulting in a worker receiving a near-lethal dose of radiation.<br />
ca. December 1991<br />
One of four cold fusion cells in a Menlo Park, CA, laboratory exploded while being moved; electrochemist Andrew Riley was killed and three others were injured. The other three cells were buried on site, leading to rumors that a nuclear reaction had taken place. A report concluded that it was a chemical explosion; a mixture of oxygen and deuterium produced by electrolysis ignited when a catalyst was exposed. The Electric Power Research Institute, which spent $2 million on the SRI cold fusion research, suspended support for the work pending the outcome of an investigation.<br />
________________________________________<br />
Power Plants<br />
3 January 1961<br />
The world&#8217;s first nuclear-related fatalities occurred following a reactor explosion at the National Reactor Testing Station in Idaho Falls, Idaho. Three technicians, were killed, with radioactivity &#8220;largely confined&#8221; (words of John A. McCone, Director of the Atomic Energy Commission) to the reactor building. The men were killed as they moved fuel rods in a &#8220;routine&#8221; preparation for the reactor start-up. One technician was blown to the ceiling of the containment dome and impaled on a control rod. His body remained there until it was taken down six days later. The men were so heavily exposed to radiation that their hands had to be buried separately with other radioactive waste, and their bodies were interred in lead coffins. Another incident three weeks later (on 25 January) resulted in a release of radiation into the atmosphere.<br />
24 July 1964<br />
Robert Peabody, 37, died at the United Nuclear Corp. fuel facility in Charlestown, Rhode Island, when liquid uranium he was pouring went critical, starting a reaction that exposed him to a lethal dose of radiation.<br />
19 November 1971<br />
The water storage space at the Northern States Power Company&#8217;s reactor in Monticello, Minnesota filled to capacity and spilled over, dumping about 50,000 gallons of radioactive waste water into the Mississippi River. Some was taken into the St. Paul water system.<br />
March 1972<br />
Senator Mike Gravel of Alaska submitted to the Congressional Record facts surrounding a routine check in a nuclear power plant which indicated abnormal radioactivity in the building&#8217;s water system. Radioactivity was confirmed in the plant drinking fountain. Apparently there was an inappropriate cross-connection between a 3,000 gallon radioactive tank and the water system.<br />
27 July 1972<br />
Two workers at the Surry Unit 2 facility in Virginia were fatally scalded after a routine valve adjustment led to a steam release in a gap in a vent line. [See also 9 December 1986]<br />
28 May 1974<br />
The Atomic Energy Commission reported that 861 &#8220;abnormal events&#8221; had occurred in 1973 in the nation&#8217;s 42 operative nuclear power plants. Twelve involved the release of radioactivity &#8220;above permissible levels.&#8221;<br />
22 March 1975<br />
A technician checking for air leaks with a lighted candle caused $100 million in damage when insulation caught fire at the Browns Ferry reactor in Decatur, Alabama. The fire burned out electrical controls, lowering the cooling water to dangerous levels, before the plant could be shut down.<br />
28 March 1979<br />
A major accident at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant near Middletown, Pennsylvania. At 4:00 a.m. a series of human and mechanical failures nearly triggered a nuclear disaster. By 8:00 a.m., after cooling water was lost and temperatures soared above 5,000 degrees, the top portion of the reactor&#8217;s 150-ton core melted. Contaminated coolant water escaped into a nearby building, releasing radioactive gasses, leading as many as 200,000 people to flee the region. Despite claims by the nuclear industry that &#8220;no one died at Three Mile Island,&#8221; a study by Dr. Ernest J. Sternglass, professor of radiation physics at the University of Pittsburgh, showed that the accident led to a minimum of 430 infant deaths.<br />
1981<br />
The Critical Mass Energy Project of Public Citizen, Inc. reported that there were 4,060 mishaps and 140 serious events at nuclear power plants in 1981, up from 3,804 mishaps and 104 serious events the previous year.<br />
11 February 1981<br />
An Auxiliary Unit Operator, working his first day on the new job without proper training, inadvertently opened a valve which led to the contamination of eight men by 110,000 gallons of radioactive coolant sprayed into the containment building of the Tennessee Valley Authority&#8217;s Sequoyah I plant in Tennessee.<br />
July 1981<br />
A flood of low-level radioactive wastewater in the sub-basement at Nine Mile Point&#8217;s Unit 1 (in New York state) caused approximately 150 55-gallon drums of high-level waste to overturn, some of which released their highly radioactive contents. Some 50,000 gallons of low-level radioactive water were subsequently dumped into Lake Ontario to make room for the cleanup. The discharge was reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, but the sub-basement contamination was not. A report leaked to the press 8 years later resulted in a study which found that high levels of radiation persisted in the still flooded facility.<br />
1982<br />
The Critical Mass Energy Project of Public Citizen, Inc. reported that 84,322 power plant workers were exposed to radiation in 1982, up from 82,183 the previous year.<br />
25 January 1982<br />
A steam generator pipe broke at the Rochester Gas &#038; Electric Company&#8217;s Ginna plant near Rochester, New York. Fifteen thousand gallons of radioactive coolant spilled onto the plant floor, and small amounts of radioactive steam escaped into the air.<br />
15-16 January 1983<br />
Nearly 208,000 gallons of water with low-level radioactive contamination was accidentally dumped into the Tennesee River at the Browns Ferry power plant.<br />
25 February 1983<br />
A catastrophe at the Salem 1 reactor in New Jersey was averted by just 90 seconds when the plant was shut down manually, following the failure of automatic shutdown systems to act properly. The same automatic systems had failed to respond in an incident three days before, and other problems plagued this plant as well, such as a 3,000 gallon leak of radioactive water in June 1981 at the Salem 2 reactor, a 23,000 gallon leak of &#8220;mildly&#8221; radioactive water (which splashed onto 16 workers) in February 1982, and radioactive gas leaks in March 1981 and September 1982 from Salem 1.<br />
9 December 1986<br />
A feedwater pipe ruptured at the Surry Unit 2 facility in Virginia, causing 8 workers to be scalded by a release of hot water and steam. Four of the workers later died from their injuries. In addition, water from the sprinkler systems caused a malfunction of the security system, preventing personnel from entering the facility. This was the second time that an incident at the Surry 2 unit resulted in fatal injuries due to scalding [see also 27 July 1972].<br />
1988<br />
It was reported that there were 2,810 accidents in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants in 1987, down slightly from the 2,836 accidents reported in 1986, according to a report issued by the Critical Mass Energy Project of Public Citizen, Inc.<br />
28 May 1993<br />
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission released a warning to the operators of 34 nuclear reactors around the country that the instruments used to measure levels of water in the reactor could give false readings during routine shutdowns and fail to detect important leaks. The problem was first bought to light by an engineer at Northeast Utilities in Connecticut who had been harassed for raising safety questions. The flawed instruments at boiling-water reactors designed by General Electric utilize pipes which were prone to being blocked by gas bubbles; a failure to detect falling water levels could have resulted, potentially leading to a meltdown.<br />
15 February 2000<br />
New York&#8217;s Indian Point II power plant vented a small amount of radioactive steam when a an aging steam generator ruptured. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission initially reported that no radioactive material was released, but later changed their report to say that there was a leak, but not of a sufficient amount to threaten public safety.<br />
6 March 2002<br />
Workers discovered a foot-long cavity eaten into the reactor vessel head at the Davis-Besse nuclear plant in Ohio. Borated water had corroded the metal to a 3/16 inch stainless steel liner which held back over 80,000 gallons of highly pressurized radioactive water. In April 2005 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission proposed fining plant owner First Energy 5.4 million dollars for their failure to uncover the problem sooner (similar problems plaguing other plants were already known within the industry), and also proposed banning System Engineer Andrew Siemaszko from working in the industry for five years due to his falsifying reactor vessel logs. As of this writing the fine and suspension were under appeal.<br />
Nov 2005<br />
High tritium levels, the result of leaking pipes, were discovered to have contaminated groundwater immediately adjacent to the Braidwood Generating Station in Braceville, Illinois.<br />
________________________________________<br />
Bombs and Bombers<br />
13 February 1950<br />
A B-36 en route from Alaska to Carswell Air Force Base in Fort Worth, Texas, developed serious mechanical difficulties, complicated by severe icing conditions. The crew headed out over the Pacific Ocean and dropped the nuclear weapons from 8,000 feet off the coast of British Columbia. The weapons&#8217; high-explosive material detonated on impact, but the crew parachuted to safety.<br />
11 April 1950<br />
A B-29 carrying a nuclear weapon crashed into a mountain near Manzano Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, killing all 13 crewmembers aboard.<br />
10 November 1950<br />
A B-50 en route to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base in Tucson, Arizona, was forced to jettison a nuclear weapon over the St. Lawrence River near St. Alexandre-de-Kamouraska, Canada.<br />
10 March 1956<br />
A B-47 with two nuclear weapons aboard disappeared over the Mediterranean Sea after flying out of MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Florida. An exhaustive search failed to locate the aircraft, its weapons, nor its crew.<br />
27 July 1956<br />
A U.S. B-47 practicing a touch-and-go landing at Lakenheath Royal Air Force Station near Cambridge, England went out of control and smashed into a storage igloo housing three Mark 6 nuclear bombs, each of which had about 8,000 pounds of TNT in its trigger mechanism. No crewmen were killed, and fire fighters were able to extinguish the blazing jet fuel before it ignited the TNT.<br />
22 May 1957<br />
A 10 megaton hydrogen bomb was accidentally dropped from a bomber in an uninhabited area near Albuquerque, New Mexico owned by the University of New Mexico. The conventional explosives detonated, creating a 12 foot deep crater 25 feet across in which some radiation was detected.<br />
28 July 1957<br />
A C-124 Globemaster transporting three nuclear weapons and a nuclear capsule from Dover Air Force Base in Delaware to Europe experienced loss of power in two engines. The crew jettisoned two of the weapons somewhere east of Rehobeth, Del., and Cape May/Wildwood, New Jersey. A search for the weapons was unsuccessful and it is a fair assumption that they still lie at the bottom of the ocean.<br />
11 October 1957<br />
A B-47 carrying a single nuclear weapon crashed shortly after takeoff. The weapon was partially destroyed in the ensuing fire, but the nuclear core was recovered intact.<br />
31 January 1958<br />
Unbeknownst to Moroccan officials, a B-47 loaded with a fully-armed nuclear weapon collapsed and caught fire on the runway at a U.S. Strategic Air Command base 90 miles northeast of Rabat. The Air Force considered evacuating the base, but instead allowed the bomber to continue to burn for seven hours. During cleanup operations a large number of vehicles and aircraft were contaminated with radiation.<br />
5 February 1958<br />
A B-47 carrying a Mark 15, Mod 0, nuclear bomb on a simulated combat mission from Homestead Air Force Base in Florida collided with an F-86. After three unsuccessful attempts to land at Hunter Air Force Base in Georgia, the B-47 crew jettisoned the nuclear bomb into the Atlantic Ocean off Savannah. The Air Force conducted a nine-week search of a 3-square-mile area in Wassaw Sound where the bomb was dropped, but declared on April 16 that the bomb was irretrievably lost. More details can be read on this Wikipedia article.<br />
11 March 1958<br />
A B-47 on its way from Hunter Air Force Base in Georgia to an overseas base accidentally dropped an unarmed nuclear weapon into the garden of Walter Gregg and his family in Mars Bluff, South Carolina. The conventional explosives detonated, destroying Gregg&#8217;s house and injuring six family members. The blast resulted in the formation of a crater 50-70 feet wide and 25-30 feet deep. Five other houses and a church were also damaged; five months later the Air Force paid the Greggs $54,000 in compensation.<br />
4 November 1958<br />
A B-47 carrying a nuclear weapon caught fire and crashed during takeoff from Dyess Air Force Base in Abilene, Texas, killing one crew member.<br />
26 November 1958<br />
A B-47 caught fire on the ground at Chennault Air Force Base in Lake Charles, Louisiana, destroying a nuclear weapon onboard, resulting in minor radioactive contamination of the immediate vicinity.<br />
15 October 1959<br />
A B-52 with two nuclear bombs collided in mid-air with a KC-135 jet tanker and crashed near Hardinsberg, Kentucky. Both bombs were recovered intact, but eight crewmembers lost their lives.<br />
7 June 1960<br />
A BOMARC-A nuclear missile burst into flames after its fuel tank was ruptured by the explosion of a high pressure helium tank at McGuire Air Force Base in New Egypt, New Jersey. The missile melted, causing plutonium contamination at the facility and in the ground water below.<br />
21 January 1961<br />
A B-52 bomber carrying one or more nuclear weapons disintegrated in midair following an engine fier and explosion approximately 10 miles north of Monticello, Utah, killing all five crewmembers.<br />
24 January 1961<br />
A B-52 bomber suffered structural failure and disintegrated in mid-air 12 miles north of Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in Goldsboro, NC, releasing two hydrogen bombs. Five crewmen parachuted to safety, while three others died when the aircraft exploded in mid-air. The bombs jettisoned as the plane descended, one parachuting to earth intact, the other plunging deep into waterlogged farmland. To this day, parts of the nuclear bomb remain embedded deep in the muck. The area is off-limits, and is tested regularly for radiation releases. More information can be found at the Broken Arrow: Goldsboro, NC site at www.ibiblio.org/bomb/.<br />
14 March 1961<br />
A B-52 with nuclear bombs crashed in California while on a training mission.<br />
13 January 1964<br />
A B-52 with two nuclear weapons crashed near Cumberland, Maryland.<br />
8 December 1964<br />
A B-58 slid off a runway at Bunker Hill (now Grissom) Air Force Base in Peru, Indiana. The resulting fire consumed portions of five onboard nuclear weapons, leading to radioactive contamination of the surrounding area.<br />
5 December 1965<br />
An A-4E aircraft accidentally fell overboard off the USS Toconderoga, with the loss of pilot LTJG D.M. Webster and a nuclear weapon. The incident, which occurred in the Pacific Ocean approximately 200 miles east of Okinawa, was not reported by the Department of Defense until 1981.<br />
17 January 1966<br />
A B-52 collided with an Air Force KC-135 jet tanker while refueling over the coast of Spain, killing eight of the eleven crew members and igniting the KC-135&#8217;s 40,000 gallons of jet fuel. Two hydrogen bombs ruptured, scattering radioactive particles over the fields of Palomares; a third landed intact near the village of Palomares; the fourth was lost at sea 12 miles off the coast of Palomares and required a search by thousands of men working for three months to recover it. Approximately 1,500 tons of radioactive soil and tomato plants were removed to the U.S. for burial at a nuclear waste dump in Aiken, S.C. The U.S. eventually settled claims by 522 Palomares residents at a cost of $600,000, and gave the town the gift of a $200,000 desalinizing plant.<br />
22 January 1968<br />
A B-52 crashed 7 miles south of Thule Air Force Base in Greenland, scattering the radioactive fragments of three hydrogen bombs over the terrain and dropping one bomb into the sea after a fire broke out in the navigator&#8217;s compartment. Contaminated ice and airplane debris were sent back to the U.S., with the bomb fragments going back to the manufacturer in Amarillo, Texas. The incident outraged the people of Denmark (which owned Greenland at the time, and which prohibits nuclear weapons over its territory) and led to massive anti-U.S. demonstrations. One of the warheads was reportedly recovered by Navy Seals and Seabees in 1979, but an August 2000 report suggests that in fact it may still be lying at the bottom of Baffin Bay. Additional details, including footage of the recovery efforts, can be viewed at news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7720049.stm courtesy of the BBC.<br />
2 November 1981<br />
A fully-armed Poseidon missile was accidentally dropped 17 feet from a crane in Scotland during a transfer operation between a U.S. submarine and its mother ship.<br />
________________________________________<br />
Submarines and Ships<br />
Some of the following incidents involve the discharge of radioactive coolant water by ships and submarines. While water from the primary coolant system stays radioactive for only a few seconds, it picks up bits of cobalt, chromium and other elements (from rusting pipes and the reactor) which remain radioactive for years. In realization of this fact, the U.S. Navy has curtailed its previously frequent practice of dumping coolant at sea.<br />
18 April 1959<br />
An experimental sodium-cooled reactor utilized aboard the USS Seawolf, the U.S.&#8217;s second nuclear submarine, was scuttled in 9,000 feet of water off the Delaware/Maryland coast in a stainless steel containment vessel. The reactor was plagued by persistent leaks in its steam system (caused by the corrosive nature of the sodium) and was later replaced with a more conventional model. The reactor is estimated to have contained 33,000 curies of radioactivity and is likely the largest single radioactive object ever dumped deliberately into the ocean. Subsequent attempts to locate the reactor proved to be futile.<br />
October 1959<br />
One man was killed and another three were seriously burned in the explosion and fire of a prototype reactor for the USS Triton at the Navy&#8217;s training center in West Milton, New York. The Navy stated, &#8220;The explosion&#8230;was completely unrelated to the reactor or any of its principal auxiliary systems,&#8221; but sources familiar with the operation claim that the high-pressure air flask which exploded was utilized to operate a critical back-up system in the event of a reactor emergency.<br />
1961<br />
The USS Theodore Roosvelt was contaminated when radioactive waste from its demineralization system, blew back onton the ship after an attempt to dispose of the material at sea. This happened on other occasions as well with other ships (for example, the USS Guardfish in 1975).<br />
10 April 1963<br />
The nuclear submarine Thresher imploded during a test dive east of Boston, killing all 129 men aboard.<br />
5 December 1965<br />
This write-up is drawn from the US Nuclear Weapons Accidents page at www.cdi.org/Issues/NukeAccidents/accidents.htm.<br />
An A-4E Skyhawk strike aircraft carrying a nuclear weapon rolled off an elevator on the U.S. aircraft carrier Ticonderoga and fell into the sea. Because the bomb was lost at a depth of approximately 16,000 feet, Pentagon officials feared that intense water pressure could have caused the B-43 hydrogen bomb to explode. It is still unknown whether an explosion did occur. The pilot, aircraft, and weapon were lost.<br />
The Pentagon claimed that the bomb was lost &#8220;500 miles away from land.&#8221; However, it was later revealed that the aircraft and nuclear weapon sank only miles from the Japanese island chain of Ryukyu. Several factors contributed to the Pentagon&#8217;s secretiveness. The USS Ticonderoga was returning from a mission off North Vietnam; confirming that the carrier had nuclear weapons aboard would document their introduction into the Vietnam War. Furthermore, Japan&#8217;s anti-nuclear law prohibited the introduction of atomic weapons into its territory, and U.S. military bases in Japan are not exempt from this law. Thus, confirming that the USS Ticonderoga carried nuclear weapons would signify U.S. violation of its military agreements with Japan. The carrier was headed to Yokosuka, Japan, and disclosure of the accident in the mid-1980s caused a strain in U.S.-Japanese relations.<br />
1968<br />
Radioactive coolant water may have been released by the USS Swordfish, which was moored at the time in Sasebo Harbor in Japan. According to one source, the incident was alleged by activists but a nearby Japanese government vessel failed to detect any such radiation leak. The purported incident was protested bitterly by the Japanese, with Premier Eisaku Sate warning that U.S. nuclear ships would no longer be allowed to call at Japanese ports unless their safety could be guaranteed.<br />
22 May 1968<br />
The U.S.S. Scorpion, a nuclear-powered attack submarine carrying two Mark 45 ASTOR torpedoes with nuclear warheads, sank mysteriously on this day. It was eventually photographed lying on the bottom of the ocean, where all ninety-nine of its crew were lost. Details of the accident remained classified until November 1993, when a Navy report detailing the incident was made public. The report suggested that a malfunction in one of Scorpion&#8217;s torpedoes could have caused the sinking, but evidence from subsequent dives to the location suggest that this was not the culprit.<br />
14 January 1969<br />
A series of explosions aboard the nuclear aircraft carrier Enterprise left 17 dead and 85 injured.<br />
16 May 1969<br />
The U.S.S. Guitarro, a $50 million nuclear submarine undergoing final fitting in San Francisco Bay, sank to the bottom as water poured into a forward compartment. A House Armed Services subcommittee later found the Navy guilty of &#8220;inexcusable carelessness&#8221; in connection with the event.<br />
12 December 1971<br />
Five hundred gallons of radioactive coolant water spilled into the Thames River near New London, Connecticut as it was being transferred from the submarine Dace to the sub tender Fulton.<br />
October-November 1975<br />
The USS Proteus, a disabled submarine tender, discharged significant amounts of radioactive coolant water into Guam&#8217;s Apra Harbor. A geiger counter check of the harbor water near two public beaches measured 100 millirems/hour, fifty times the allowable dose.<br />
22 May 1978<br />
Up to 500 gallons of radioactive water was released when a valve was mistakenly opened aboard the USS Puffer near Puget Sound in Washington.<br />
November 1992<br />
Due to a valve failure, the nuclear-powered USS Long Beach leaked 109 gallons of radioactive cooling water over a 44-day period while docked at San Diego Naval Station. An additional 50 gallons had leaked out there the previous April and May. The San Diego Union reported that coolant had also been released at Pearl Harbor (Hawaii) and Indian Island (Washington). U.S. Navy officials insist that the level of radiation posed no threat, and that a &#8220;very small amount of valve leakage that is unavoidable and occurs on all ships is well understood, controlled and accounted for.&#8221;<br />
________________________________________<br />
Nuclear Bomb Tests and Testing Facilities<br />
26 April 1953<br />
Radioactive rain, the result of above-ground nuclear tests, fell on Troy, New York.<br />
5 September 1961<br />
President Kennedy ordered the resumption of nuclear testing, &#8220;underground, with no fallout.&#8221;<br />
10 December 1961<br />
Clouds of radioactive steam escaped from an underground nuclear test, closing several New Mexico highways.<br />
4 June 1962 The Bluegill nuclear test, designed to detonate a nuclear device in the atmosphere, was aborted 10 minutes after launch when the missile tracking system failed prior to nuclear detonation. The nuclear device was lost at sea.<br />
20 June 1962 A failure of the Starfish nuclear test, designed to detonate a nuclear device in space, caused radioactive debris to be scattered across Johnston Island in the Pacific Ocean.<br />
9 December 1968<br />
Clouds of radioactive steam from a nuclear test in Nevada broke through the ground, releasing fallout and violating the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty signed 5 years earlier.<br />
18 December 1970<br />
An underground nuclear test in Nevada resulted in a cloud of radioactive steam to be thrust 8,000 feet in the air over Wyoming.<br />
15 July 1999<br />
A spokesperson for President Clinton announced that thousands of contract workers at U.S. nuclear weapons facilities, exposed to toxic and radioactive substances during the previous 50 years, could seek federal compensation for related illnesses.<br />
________________________________________<br />
Processing, Storage, Shipping and Disposal<br />
From 1946 to 1970 approximately 90,000 cannisters of radioactive waste were jettisoned in 50 ocean dumps up and down the East and West coasts of the U.S., including prime fishing areas, as part of the early nuclear waste disposal program from the military&#8217;s atomic weapons program. The waste also included contaminated tools, chemicals, and laboratory glassware from weapons laboratories, and commercial/medical facilities<br />
December 1962 A summary report was presented at an Atomic Energy Commission symposium in Germantown, Maryland, listing 47 accidents involving shipment of nuclear materials to that date, 17 of which were considered &#8220;serious.&#8221;<br />
11 May 1969<br />
A plutonium fire broke out in Building 776 at the Atomic Energy Commission&#8217;s Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant. Plutonium was released into the atmosphere and tracked out of the building on the boots of firefighters, and several buildings at the factory were so badly contaminated that they had to be dismantled.<br />
1971<br />
After experimenting with disposal of radioactive waste in salt, the Atomic Energy Commission announced that &#8220;Project Salt Vault&#8221; would solve the waste problem. But when 180,000 gallons of contaminated water was pumped into a borehole; it promptly and unexpectedly disappeared. The project was abandoned two years later.<br />
1972<br />
The West Valley, NY fuel reprocessing plant was closed after 6 years in operation, leaving 600,000 gallons of high-level wastes buried in leaking tanks. The site caused measurable contamination of Lakes Ontario and Erie.<br />
December 1972<br />
A major fire and two explosions occurred at a Pauling, New York plutonium fabrication plant. An undetermined amount of radioactive plutonium was scattered inside and outside the plant, resulting in its permanent shutdown.<br />
1979<br />
The Critical Mass Energy Project (part of Ralph Nader&#8217;s Public Citizen, Inc.) tabulated 122 accidents involving the transport of nuclear material in 1979, including 17 involving radioactive contamination.<br />
16 July 1979<br />
A dam holding radioactive uranium mill tailings broke, sending an estimated 100 million gallons of radioactive liquids and 1,100 tons of solid wastes downstream at Church Rock, New Mexico.<br />
August 1979<br />
Highly enriched uranium was released from a top-secret nuclear fuel plant near Erwin, Tennessee. About 1,000 people were contaminated with up to 5 times as much radiation as would normally be received in a year. Between 1968 and 1983 the plant &#8220;lost&#8221; 234 pounds of highly enriched uranium, forcing the plant to be closed six times during that period.<br />
January 1980<br />
A 5.5 Richter earthquake at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where large amounts of nuclear material are kept, caused a tritium leak.<br />
19 September 1980<br />
An Air Force repairman doing routine maintenance in a Titan II ICBM silo in Damascus, Arkansas dropped a wrench socket, which rolled off a work platform and fell to the bottom of the silo. The socket struck the missile, causing a leak from a pressurized fuel tank. The missile complex and surrounding areas were evacuated. Eight and a half hours later, the fuel vapors ignited, causing an explosion which killed an Air Force specialist and injured 21 others. The explosion also blew off the 740-ton reinforced concrete-and-steel silo door and catapulted the warhead 600 feet into the air. The silo has since been filled in with gravel, and operations have been transferred to a similar installation at Rock, Kansas.<br />
21 September 1980<br />
Two canisters containing radioactive materials fell off a truck on New Jersey&#8217;s Route 17. The driver, en route from Pennsylvania to Toronto, did not notice the missing cargo until he reached Albany, New York.<br />
1983<br />
The Department of Energy confirmed that 1,200 tons of mercury had been released over the years from the Y-12 Nuclear Weapons Components Plant at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, the U.S.&#8217;s earliest nuclear weapons production plant. In 1987, the DOE also reported that PCBs, heavy metals, and radioactive substances were all present in the groundwater beneath Y-12. Y-12 and the nearby K-25 and X-10 plants were found to have contaminated the atmosphere, soil and streams in the area.<br />
December 1984<br />
The Fernald Uranium Plant, a 1,050-acre uranium fuel production complex 20 miles northwest of Cincinnati, Ohio, was temporarily shut down after the Department of Energy disclosed that excessive amounts of radioactive materials had been released through ventilating systems. Subsequent reports revealed that 230 tons of radioactive material had leaked into the Greater Miami River valley during the previous thirty years, 39 tons of uranium dust had been released into the atmosphere, 83 tons had been discharged into surface water, and 5,500 tons of radioactive and other hazardous substances had been released into pits and swamps where they seeped into the groundwater. In addition, 337 tons of uranium hexafluoride was found to be missing, its whereabouts completely unknown. In 1988 nearby residents sued and were granted a $73 million settlement by the government. The plant was not permanently shut down until 1989.<br />
1986<br />
A truck carrying low-level radioactive material swerved to avoid a farm vehicle, went off a bridge on Route 84 in Idaho, and dumped part of its cargo in the Snake River. Officials reported the release of radioactivity.<br />
6 January 1986<br />
A container of highly toxic gas exploded at The Sequoyah Fuels Corp. uranium processing factory in Gore, Oklahoma, causing one worker to die (when his lungs were destroyed) and 130 others to seek medical treatment. In response, the Government kept the plant closed for more than a year and fined owners Kerr-McGee $310,000, citing poorly trained workers, poorly maintained equipment and a disregard for safety and the environment. [See also 24 November 1992.]<br />
1986<br />
After almost 40 years of cover-ups, the U.S. Government released 19,000 pages of previously classified documents which revealed that the Hanford Engineer Works was responsible for the release of significant amounts of radioactive materials into the atmosphere and the adjacent Columbia River. Between 1944 and 1966, the eight reactors, a source of plutonium production for atomic weapons, discharged billions of gallons of liquids and billions of cubic meters of gases containing plutonium and other radioactive contaminants into the Columbia River, and the soil and air of the Columbia Basin. Although detrimental effects were noticed as early as 1948, all reports critical of the facilities remained classified. By the summer of 1987, the cost of cleaning up Hanford was estimated to be $48.5 billion. The Technical Steering Panel of the government-sponsored Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project released the following statistics in July 1990: Of the 270,000 people living in the affected area, most received low doses of radiation from Iodine, but about 13,500 received a total dose some 1,300 times the annual amount of airborne radiation considered safe for civilians by the Department of Energy. Approximately 1,200 children received doses far in excess of this number, and many more received additional doses from contaminants other than Iodine. [See also May 1997 and July 2000.]<br />
1988<br />
The National Research Council panel released a report listing 30 &#8220;significant unreported incidents&#8221; at the Savannah River production plants over the previous 30 years. As at Hanford (see 1986), ground water contamination resulted from pushing production of radioactive materials past safe limits at this weapons complex. In January 1989, scientists discovered a fault running under the entire site through which contaminants reached the underground aquifer, a major source of drinking water for the southeast. Turtles in nearby ponds were found to contain radioactive strontium of up to 1,000 times the normal background level.<br />
6 June 1988<br />
Radiation Sterilizers, Incorporated reported that a leak of Cesium-137 had occurred at their Decatur, Georgia facility. Seventy thousand medical supply containers and milk cartons were recalled as they had been exposed to radiation. Ten employees were also exposed, three of whom &#8220;had enough on them that they contaminated other surfaces&#8221; including materials in their homes and cars, according to Jim Setser at the Georgia Department of Natural Resources.<br />
October 1988<br />
The Rocky Flats, Colorado plutonium bomb manufacturing site was partially closed after two employees and a Department of Energy inspector inhaled radioactive particles. Subsequent investigations revealed safety violations (including uncalibrated monitors and insufficient fire-response equipment) and leaching of radioactive contaminants into the local groundwater.<br />
24 November 1992<br />
The Sequoyah Fuels Corp. uranium processing factory in Gore, Oklahoma closed after repeated citations by the Government for violations of nuclear safety and environmental rules. It&#8217;s record during 22 years of operation included an accident in 1986 that killed one worker and injured dozens of others and the contamination of the Arkansas River and groundwater. The Sequoyah Fuels plant, one of two privately-owned American factories that fabricated fuel rods and armor-piercing bullet shells, had been shut down a week before by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission when an accident resulted in the release of toxic gas. Thirty-four people sought medical attention as a result of the accident. The plant had also been shut down the year before when unusually high concentrations of uranium were detected in water in a nearby construction pit. [Also see 6 January 1986 for details of an additional incident.] A Government investigation revealed that the company had known for years that uranium was leaking into the ground at levels 35,000 times higher than Federal law allows; Carol Couch, the plant&#8217;s environmental manager, was cited by the Government for obstructing the investigation and knowingly giving Federal agents false information.<br />
31 March 1994<br />
Fire at a nuclear research facility on Long Island, New York resulted in the nuclear contamination of three fire fighters, three reactor operators, and one technician. Measurable amounts of radioactive substances were released into the immediate environment.<br />
May 1997<br />
A 40 gallon tank of toxic chemicals, stored illegally at the U.S. Government&#8217;s Hanford Engineer works exploded, causing the release of 20,000-30,000 gallons of plutonium-contaminated water. A cover-up ensued, involving the contractors doing clean-up and the Department of Energy, who denied the release of radioactive materials. They also told eight plant workers that tests indicated that they hadn&#8217;t been exposed to plutonium even though no such tests actually were conducted (later testing revealed that in fact they had not been exposed). Fluor Daniel Hanford Inc., operator of the Hanford Site, was cited for violations of the Department of Energy&#8217;s nuclear safety rules and fined $140,625. Violations associated with the explosion included the contractor&#8217;s failure to assure that breathing devices operated effectively, failure to make timely notifications of the emergency, and failure to conduct proper radiological surveys of workers. Other violations cited by the DOE included a number of events between November 1996 and June 1997 involving Fluor Daniel Hanford&#8217;s failure to assure adherence to PFP &#8220;criticality&#8221; safety procedures. (&#8221;Criticality&#8221; features are defined as those features used &#8220;to assure safe handling of fissile materials and prevention of&#8230;an unplanned and uncontrolled chain reaction that can release large amounts of radiation.&#8221;) [See also 1986 and July 2000.]<br />
8 August 1999<br />
The Washington Post reported that thousands of workers were unwittingly exposed to plutonium and other highly radioactive metals over a 23-year period (beginning in the mid-1950&#8217;s) at the Department of Energy&#8217;s Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Kentucky. Workers, told they were handling Uranium (rather than the far more toxic plutonium), inhaled radioactive dust while processing the materials as part of a government experiment to recycle used nuclear reactor fuel.<br />
June 2000<br />
U.S. Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH) led a field senate hearing regarding workers exposed to hazardous materials while working in the nation&#8217;s atomic plants. At the hearing, which revealed information about potential on and off-site contamination at the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant in Piketon, Ohio, DeWine noted, &#8220;We know that as a result of Cold War efforts, the government, yes, our federal government, allowed thousands of workers at its facilities across the country to be exposed to poisonous materials, such as beryllium dust, plutonium, and silicon, without adequate protection.&#8221; Testimony also indicated that the Piketon plant altered workers&#8217; radiation dose readings and worked closely with medical professionals to fight worker&#8217;s compensation claims.<br />
July 2000<br />
Wildfires in the vicinity of the Hanford facility hit the highly radioactive &#8220;B/C&#8221; waste disposal trenches, raising airborne plutonium radiation levels in the nearby cities of Pasco and Richland to 1,000 above normal. Wildfires also threatened the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and the DOE&#8217;s Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. In the latter case, the fires closely approached large amounts of stored radioactive waste and forced the evacuation of 1,800 workers. [See also 1986 and May 1997.]<br />
http://www.lutins.org/nukes.html<br />
`</p>
<p>Nuclear carrots and sticks:<br />
Germany, Carrot:  In 1998, Germany’s coalition government proposed the complete abandonment of nuclear energy. The country is now in the process of phasing out nuclear power, with plans to shut down each of its remaining 19 reactors at the end of their operating live.</p>
<p>Japan, Stick: Japan currently has 54 operating nuclear reactors and one of the highest earthquake rates per area and per capita in the world.</p>
<p>France’s 59 operating nuclear reactors produce 76 percent the country’s electricity, making France the most nuclear-reliant country in the world. This is NOT a distinction to be proud of. France gets a big stick for sticking it to the future, radioactive-izing some of the most beautiful land and most sparkling water in the homeland and for spreading their dirty trash around the planet.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>Sources and links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a><br />
Union of Concerned Scientists<br />
Nuclear Power</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/">http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/ </a></p>
<p>U.S. Government Accounting Office<br />
<a href="http://www.gao.gov/">http://www.gao.gov/ </a></p>
<p>Helen Caldicott, MD<br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm </a><br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm </a></p>
<p>Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)</p>
<p>Green America<br />
<a href="http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm">http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5<br />
">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/">http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/ </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478">http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478 </a></p>
<p>DemocracyNow<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose">http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose </a></p>
<p>3 mile island today<br />
<ahref="http://www.google.com/search?q=3+mile+island+today&#038;hl=en&#038;tbs=tl:1&#038;tbo=u&#038;ei=9HqOS5ngMI3esgP0koCxCA&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=timeline_result&#038;ct=title&#038;resnum=16&#038;ved=0CDMQ5wIwDw">3 mile island today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/static/1979/1979-story24.htm<br />
"> THE TRUTH ABOUT THREE MILE ISLAND &#8230;<br />
      AND OTHER NUCLEAR &#8220;INCIDENTS&#8221;</a></p>
<p>New revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety<a href="http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A393821<br />
"> The truth behind the meltdown </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mothersalert.org/bertell.html ">3 MILE ISLAND COVER-UP:<br />
DR. ROSALIE BERTELL&#8217;S SIGNED, NOTARIZED STATEMENT<br />
 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/node/33712"> Ron Paul on Nuclear Power? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html<br />
">http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html<br />
">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm<br />
">http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html   "> Chernobyl </a></p>
<p><a href="http://sites.nationalacademies.org/NRC/index.htm<br />
"> National Research Council </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-final-nail-in-the-pro-nuclear-argument/ "> Grist Magazine</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nukefree.org/"> nukefree.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nonukes.org/"> nonukes.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.biofuelswatch.com/obama-contradicts-himself/"> biofuelswatch.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/5611-no-nukes-is-good-nukes.html"> pacific free press</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/letter-to-president-obama/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama: </a><br />
<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/the-nuclear-retreat/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/"> Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p>`</p>
<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/"> Nuclear mishaps, A short list…</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' title='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' alt='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Alerts!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consider This]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures  
NUCLEAR WASTE: OUT OF CONTROL&#8230;ON PURPOSE - Di&#8230;
Debunking the &#8216;Nuclear Renaissance&#8217; - Interview # 3: Diane D&#8217;Riggo, Radioactive Waste Project Director for the Washington, D.C. based Nuclear Information Resource service ( http://www.nirs.org/ ), 





¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
Nuclear waste: The threat
The continuing problem of nuclear waste. From the video, Americas Dialogue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures  </p>
<p>NUCLEAR WASTE: OUT OF CONTROL&#8230;ON PURPOSE - Di&#8230;<br />
Debunking the &#8216;Nuclear Renaissance&#8217; - Interview # 3: Diane D&#8217;Riggo, Radioactive Waste Project Director for the Washington, D.C. based Nuclear Information Resource service ( http://www.nirs.org/ ), </p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Rb0bMISOWQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-Rb0bMISOWQ&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬<br />
Nuclear waste: The threat<br />
The continuing problem of nuclear waste. From the video, Americas Dialogue I, which can be viewed in its entirety at: http://www.americasdialogue..</p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/omXT5slKHGs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/omXT5slKHGs&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>Only Kooks Push Nukes In EON&#8217;s on-going interview series NUCLEAR NONSENSE: Debunking the &#8216;Nuclear Renaissance&#8217;, energy researchers and veteran campaigners point out the cascade of fatal fallacies o&#8230;<br />
Only Kooks Push Nukes In EON&#8217;s on-going interview series NUCLEAR NONSENSE: Debunking the &#8216;Nuclear Renaissance&#8217;, energy researchers and veteran campaigners point out the cascade of fatal fallacies o&#8230;   </p>
<p>________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Harvey Wasserman Talks to Amy Goodman about the Omnibus Energy bill with Loan Guarantees for the Nuclear industry.  </p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_dpZap0GFFk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_dpZap0GFFk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>Dr. Arjun Makhijani, Founder/Director of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER), and author of the new book Carbon-Free and Nuclear-Free: A Roadmap for U.S. Energy Policy, decon&#8230;   </p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o8kfTH_no4g&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o8kfTH_no4g&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Dr Helen Caldicott leads an international campaign to educate the public about the medical hazards of the nuclear age, and the changes in human behavior &#8230;winner of Australian Peace Prize 2006 Nominated Nobel Peace Prize dangers of nuclear power plants Australian Liberal government new policy on Nuclear reactors uranium nuclear waste wed why we &#8230;</p>
<object width="384" height="313">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6izTuW1sYtk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6izTuW1sYtk&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="384" height="313" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<p>_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>Debunking the &#8216;Nuclear Renaissance&#8217; - Interview # 4: Michael Mariotte, Executive Director of the Washington, D.C. based Nuclear Information Resource service ( http://www.nirs.org/ ), talks about &#8230;  </p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2NmtpRGkOE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/d2NmtpRGkOE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>Amory Lovins: Expanding Nuclear Power Makes Climate Change Worse (Amy)</p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Oqa3bNhTwE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_Oqa3bNhTwE&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
<p>____________________________________________________________</p>
<p>NUKES OVER AMERICA!</p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o55-r5-KEvU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o55-r5-KEvU&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>`</p>
<p>The Case of the &#8220;Missing&#8221; Nukes – 1<br />
A Minot-assigned bomber inadvertently carried five nuclear warheads during a cross-country flight to Barksdale AFB, Louisiana on Au&#8230;</p>
<object width="640" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p3hW5FB1DKY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p3hW5FB1DKY&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
<p>Nuclear Power: Promoting a Myth<br />
Russell Lowes talks about how nuclear power is being promoted by the nuclear industry again as cheap, clean and efficient. They hope to foist another round of reactors on the U.S. at the expense of&#8230;  </p>
<object width="480" height="385">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bbe5p_UGqHg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bbe5p_UGqHg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/"> Nuclear mishaps, A short list…</a></p>
<p>Sources and links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a><br />
Union of Concerned Scientists<br />
Nuclear Power</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/">http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/ </a></p>
<p>U.S. Government Accounting Office<br />
<a href="http://www.gao.gov/">http://www.gao.gov/ </a></p>
<p>Helen Caldicott, MD<br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm </a><br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm </a></p>
<p>Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)</p>
<p>Green America<br />
<a href="http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm">http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5<br />
">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/">http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/ </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478">http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478 </a></p>
<p>DemocracyNow<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose">http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose </a></p>
<p>3 mile island today<br />
<ahref="http://www.google.com/search?q=3+mile+island+today&#038;hl=en&#038;tbs=tl:1&#038;tbo=u&#038;ei=9HqOS5ngMI3esgP0koCxCA&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=timeline_result&#038;ct=title&#038;resnum=16&#038;ved=0CDMQ5wIwDw">3 mile island today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/static/1979/1979-story24.htm<br />
"> THE TRUTH ABOUT THREE MILE ISLAND &#8230;<br />
      AND OTHER NUCLEAR &#8220;INCIDENTS&#8221;</a></p>
<p>New revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety<a href="http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A393821<br />
"> The truth behind the meltdown </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mothersalert.org/bertell.html ">3 MILE ISLAND COVER-UP:<br />
DR. ROSALIE BERTELL&#8217;S SIGNED, NOTARIZED STATEMENT<br />
 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/node/33712"> Ron Paul on Nuclear Power? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html<br />
">http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html<br />
">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm<br />
">http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html   "> Chernobyl </a></p>
<p><a href="http://sites.nationalacademies.org/NRC/index.htm<br />
"> National Research Council </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-final-nail-in-the-pro-nuclear-argument/ "> Grist Magazine</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nukefree.org/"> nukefree.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nonukes.org/"> nonukes.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.biofuelswatch.com/obama-contradicts-himself/"> biofuelswatch.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/5611-no-nukes-is-good-nukes.html"> pacific free press</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/letter-to-president-obama/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama: </a><br />
<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/the-nuclear-retreat/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/"> Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p>`</p>
<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/"> Nuclear mishaps, A short list…</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' title='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' alt='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alerts!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help
I have watched with interest since The President’s most resent declarations about nuclear energy, and while much of the ‘environmental’ and ‘humanitarian’ communities are rightly outraged and rightly feeling betrayed, the movement to ‘stop the insanity’ is disappointingly slow and weak, so I must ask for a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><font color="#990033">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</strong></p>
<p><strong>I have watched with interest</strong> since The President’s most resent declarations about nuclear energy, and while much of the ‘environmental’ and ‘humanitarian’ communities are rightly outraged and rightly feeling betrayed, the movement to ‘stop the insanity’ is disappointingly slow and weak, so I must ask for a few moments of your attention… </p>
<p><strong>We have enjoyed a relatively &#8216;cool&#8217; few decades</strong>, No new Nuke start-ups since Reagan (30 years). Lately the President has been going way off the deep end and wants to initiate a Nuclear Renaissance. Now just in case you haven&#8217;t thought about it in a while, here is just part of<br />
The Argument Against Nuclear Power (The Dirtiest Power):  </p>
<p><strong>THE FAILED MID-LAST CENTURY TECHNOLOGY</strong></p>
<p><strong>Exorbitant Cost:</strong> Cost estimates for new reactor construction move in only one direction, UP, UP and UP. Congress has already awarded the nuclear industry $18.5 billion in federal loan guarantees for new reactor construction (the President wants to bump that up to about $60,freakin ’Billion) and Nukies are demanding even more. Ultimately, as history shows, taxpayers will foot the bill…<br />
~ for building the deadly monstrosities,<br />
~ for defending them from attack,<br />
~ for cleaning up after the routine screw-ups and the inevitable major disasters (and the disaster- related relocation of populations),<br />
~ and for decommissioning them after their service period.<br />
Of course then there is the cost of monitoring and containing the waste FOREVER.<br />
As an example, on the small side of typical, is Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station with its share of the county’s over  60,000 metric tons of spent fuel and its 1,435 spent fuel assemblies and innumerable additional tons of contaminated materials. This little plant was torn down 5 years ago, but the utility customers continue to pay EIGHT MILLION DOLLARS per year just to maintain and guard the untouchable stuff on site… from just one reactor. (http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2009/0915/homeless-nuclear-waste)<br />
Nuclear power has already been subsidized to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars over the past 50-some years. And to be fair, every BILLION that we allocate swells to much more because most of our money is borrowed from other countries and must be paid back with interest.<br />
Even the cost of proposing such non-sense, the cost of all the efforts made by our representatives on behalf of ‘Corporation Nuke’ and the cost of the protests which must be mounted to resists/stop the proposed renaissance is significant… We could be spending our energies on being ‘Pro’ something good… instead of acting ‘Anti’ something ridiculous.<br />
Government support of nukes means that it will be done essentially with the people’s money but the profit will go to the black-corporations. There is a very real ‘never-ending’ expense tied to this failed technology and if our grandchildren ever ‘miss a payment’, so to speak, more stuff will leak and ‘hot’ stockpiles will be more venerable to theft and attack… Once we create the contaminated buildings, complexes and waste we can’t take our attention off of it for one moment, and will never stop paying. Yeah, good idea Mr. President. Nukes are a fine example of a corporate enterprise which some like to call ‘too big to fail’. That doesn’t mean that they don’t fail, they very reliably DO fail. What it means is that the biggest expenses tied to failure are born by the people, of course a nuke bail-out indicates a problem far greater in scope and intensity that a bank bail-out. From the perspective of the aware consumer investment in this obsolete technology is inequitable to the max.   </p>
<p><strong>Climate Change:</strong> Nuclear energy cannot help prevent climate instability. Nuclear power plants are far too costly, they can hardly pay for themselves by the time of decommissioning, they take too long to build, and are too expensive to operate to affect the problem in time. By the time it takes to license and build a nuke (something like ten years) we may be beyond the climate catastrophe tipping point… but could have had years of operational clean technologies well underway… If support were appropriately directed.  In fact, investments in nuclear power obviously deprive other efforts.<br />
Can you imagine if the support of 60 BILLION DOLLARS were directed towards technologies and efforts which make sense and could actually provide solutions? Such a degree of support in the right direction would be unprecedented a-million-fold. It would in fact be the biggest boon for domestic economic health and one of the greatest gifts we could give our children!  60 BILLION DOLLARS for something good, please try to imagine that.<br />
By the way nuclear power is [in reality] so immensely carbon-heavy/carbon dependent, as we can see, just accounting for the fossil fuels consumed from mining through building and to start-up, that it is estimated that a nuke doesn’t actually produce ‘reactor generated’ electricity for 15 years or longer (that’s how long it takes to offset all the ancient sunlight [fossil fuel] used to get the plant built and fueled). That’s almost half way through its entire initial license term. It is not clear that these estimates even include the ‘carbon cost’ of the mountains of concrete used for foundations, 21 foot thick floors, skeletons and containment walls and multi-mega-ton domes. Concrete has huge amounts of ‘embodied energy’, as it uses exorbitant amounts of carbon-source energy to create the indispensible ‘portland cement’ component of concrete. (Embodied energy is the energy consumed by all of the processes associated with the production of a material, from the acquisition of natural resources to product delivery), concrete has far and away the highest embodied energy of any common building material. Yes, I know that some wind turbine towers and dams for hydroelectric also tie up concrete,  but on scale there is a big difference, besides, dams do, and wind towers can, last much longer than a nuke and when the dam is disassembled, the concrete can be recycled. Wind towers and dams, while they may have (or make) their own problems do not radiologically contaminate, the site, the surrounding area and all of the materials used for all time. You see, contrary to what nukies claim, and contrary to one of the President’s lies, Nukes are quite ‘carbon-heavy’, In addition, large amounts of chlorofluorocarbon gas (CFC) are emitted during the enrichment of uranium. CFC gas is not only up to 20,000 times more efficient as an atmospheric heat trapper (greenhouse gas) than CO2, but it is a multifaceted pollutant and a convicted destroyer of the ozone layer.  </p>
<p><strong>Terrorism:</strong> The opportunity for theft of nuclear materials, if for use to contaminate utility water (which could end up inside millions of people from just one utility in just one day), or in a garage-built ‘dirty bomb, or any number of creative uses would increase dramatically if we do actively initiate a ‘Nuclear renaissance’. There is, by the way a whole bunch of ‘Hot Material’ missing already, yeah, just missing. In fact there is an entire ‘Hot’ nuclear submarine missing off the east coast of the U.S. For more such nightmares see #1<br />
Aside from theft of fissile / fissionable material the reactors themselves are huge terrorist targets. They are currently ill-protected, and the cost of protecting/defending them is never figured into the propaganda spit out by the promoters. Thirty-two U.S. reactors have fuel pools on the upper levels of the reactor building, shielded only by sheet metal. If I know this, people with a grudge know it too. They might as well paint a big ‘bull’s eye’ on top of the building. </p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-16.jpg' title='nuke 16'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-16.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke 16' /></a></p>
<p>MISSING PLUTONIUM &#8212; It takes about 17 pounds of plutonium to make a traditional nuclear bomb.<br />
 According to the General Accounting Office, the investigative branch of Congress, security at the government&#8217;s nuclear fuel reprocessing plants is inadequate and monitoring systems are not accurate enough to detect the loss of bomb-sized amounts of plutonium [].<br />
The GAO report notes (admits) the following amounts of plutonium &#8220;unaccounted for&#8221; at the government&#8217;s Savannah River reprocessing plant in South Carolina (one of three in the nation) &#8212; 114 pounds in 1964; 18 pounds in 1969; 38 pounds in 1970; and about 10 pounds in 1978. </p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-3.jpg' title='nuke 3'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-3.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke 3' /></a><br />
<strong>Routine Radioactive Releases:</strong> All reactors are designed to release radiation into the air, water and soil and are anything but ‘emissions-free’. Each and every one of the 104 reactors in the U.S. release radioactivity every day of operation. These are not benign burps, but daily reoccurring fatalistic farts. </p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-3.jpg' title='nuke waste 3'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-3.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke waste 3' /></a><br />
<strong>Radioactive Waste:</strong> The entire nuclear fuel chain, from prospecting/mining to milling, transporting, processing, enrichment, fuel fabrication, and fuel irradiation in reactors, generates and/or releases radioactive waste [and wastes lots of carbon heavy energy]. Nuclear reactors produce large amounts of long-lasting, deadly radioactive waste (gaseous, liquid and solid). There is no operating repository site anywhere in the world for high-level radioactive waste. “Low-level” radioactive waste is an oxymoron, a misnomer and is dumped into landfills or incinerated, contaminating our water and air. There are already consumer goods containing ‘recycled’ radioactive waste. Talk about deferring HUGE, virtually perpetual costs (economic and health) to our children and our children&#8217;s children&#8217;s children&#8217;s children&#8217;s children&#8217;s children&#8217;s&#8230; children. Other ‘by-products’ are built into the wings of commercial and military aircraft… And tons and tons of DU (depleted uranium) have been incorporated into munitions and subsequently exploded and spread, as a fine powder, all over the Middle East, some of which comes home in the bodies of soldiers who then spread the hot-contamination to family and friends. Yeah, we’re behaving real responsibly with the nuke stuff…… </p>
<p><strong>Accidents:</strong> Accidents are inevitable. Virtually all other industries admit that. Existing evacuation plans for nuke accidents are insufficient and unrealistic. The planet and her children usually recover from other types of industrial accidents eventually; it’s different with ‘eternal’, ‘super-toxic’ nuclear stuff. The Price-Anderson Act ensures that the liability of an accident to a utility is capped at $10.8 billion and there is a move in Washington to lower liability. A memorable reactor accident could easily cost $1TRILLION, the difference would be paid by, you guessed it, taxpayers. In the foreseeable future that would be our kids.<br />
Remember a serious disaster is a sure thing if we build and operate many more nukes, and ‘the people’ will pay economically, and in quality of life and in terms of health. </p>
<p><strong>Nobody, not a handsome constitutional lawyer ‘change’ guy, not some self-proclaimed ‘maverick’ not a holier-than-the lower forty-eight ‘Rouge Sara, NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LAY THAT ON OUR KIDS!!!</strong>  </p>
<p>Using Three Mile Island as an example, Ernest Sternglass, professor of radiological physics at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, has revealed that the accident at TMI may have exposed about a million people to up to 130 times more radiation than the government has reported so far. The effects of this exposure on the health of those people also will be significantly more serious and longer-lasting than the NRC has so far acknowledged.<br />
In its attempt to assure the public that radiation exposure from the accident was minimal, the NRC reported only the external gamma radiation doses received from passing clouds of radioactive gases.<br />
The total dose received by vital organs and bones from inhalation of fission gases has not been calculated by the commission, even though it is through inhalation that the greatest biological damage occurs. Calculations based on data from earlier nuclear accidents and from nuclear bomb tests show that when gases are inhaled they produce a radiation dose 100 - 200 times greater than the dose absorbed externally.</p>
<p><strong>NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO LAY THAT ON OUR KIDS!!!</strong></p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuclearexplosion_1_1_1_11.jpg' title='nuke expln'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuclearexplosion_1_1_1_11.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke expln' /></a><br />
<strong>Reactors and Bombs:</strong> Vice Pres Joe has been running around talking about reducing the nuclear arms stockpiles worldwide (while admitting that we are beefing up our own, in fact his boss has committed to boost the expenditure by at least five Billion over five years to be spent on the nuke arsenal and related labs). These guys are missing (hiding) an important connection. “You can’t prevent nuke warfare if you fart around with nuke energy. The world cannot free itself from nuclear weapons while reactors and nuclear fuel chain facilities such as uranium enrichment and reprocessing factories exist. Hello, have you looked at Iran, Israel, North Korea, India and Pakistan lately? </p>
<p><strong>Squeezing the world:</strong> The planet keeps getting smaller in a sense, as we contaminate more of her land, air and water. There is no more dramatic AND PERMINANT way to contaminate our life-sustaining resources than with interminable radioactivity. It is the most deadly kind of poison and it lasts virtually forever. So as we build more nukes (reactors for power and bombs for killing… they go hand and hand) we remove more and more of the limited land on Earth from the ranks of inhabitability. That’s no small crime. When we pollute in pre-nuke ways it can be nasty, and I don’t mean to minimize, but the Planet’s faculty of homeostasis will generally restore balance within several generations. As wrong as that can be, by comparison spreading nuke-pollution around changes things in a very unhealthy way virtually forever. Society has noticed in the past few decades that it’s getting rather crowded on our home planet. Who thinks it makes sense to keep adding more and more huge tracts of irreplaceable ‘terra-limita’ to ever-growing ‘fenced-off – KEEP OUT’ areas?<br />
<a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-3.jpg' title='nuke waste 3'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-3.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke waste 3' /></a></p>
<p>For the past 20 years, people in parts of Pennsylvania can’t safely grow a vegetable garden in their own yard. They will never be able to thanks to a little glitch, one like the NRC clamed could only happen once in a million years. Here in beautiful sunny Arizona, one of the best ‘organic’ farms can’t really grow anything organic, and never will because of its proximity to the Palo Verde Nuclear Generation Station. The company has spent millions of dollars trying to persuade the NRC that its mistakes—like deliberately draining water from the piping for emergency core cooling system pumps between 1992 and 2004, when the NRC caught them at it—aren&#8217;t so bad. Every day the presence and operation of nukes further adulterates ‘the commons’, so there is less and less land to live on, grow food on and leave to the children. In the case of nuclear contamination, the land so poisoned never recovers. In effect ‘the commons’ belongs to everyone born on Earth, but much of it continues to be ruined virtually forever by the shortsighted selfishness of a few. It’s a spiral of downward productivity and increasing insanity which is (according to his own words) supported by Mr. Obama.</p>
<p><strong>Comes back to bite ya’:</strong> There is no place to put the hot stuff and we can’t get it off the planet. Nobody wants it, so more and more of it from the big, modern, industrial countries is shipped to third world locations where unstable governments coup back-and-forth, in-and-out, and the people can’t afford a full meal. Who thinks that deadly radioactive waste will be safely guarded and sufficiently contained it the rusty sheds forever?<br />
<a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-5.jpg' title='nuke waste 5'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-5.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke waste 5' /></a> </p>
<p>There is nowhere to run. If you send it to Timbuktu it&#8217;s going to come back and bite you.<br />
<a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-29-grand-kids-problem.jpg' title='nuke waste 29, grand kids'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-29-grand-kids-problem.jpg' alt='nuke waste 29, grand kids' /></a></p>
<p><strong>New Dumb Ideas:</strong> Some of the ‘taxpayer- milkers’ with plutonium brains are also pushing for funding to develop, and more money to build a nationwide battery of smaller nukes, so everyone can have a nuke in his proverbial back yard.<br />
The pushers like to say that the downsized plants will be inherently safer. Listen to what they’re saying, ‘safer’, not ‘safe’. And to say that new, small plants will be safer [their words] is to say that the ‘perfectly safe’ [their words] conventional plants actually aren’t safe after all. Anyone smell contradiction?</p>
<p><strong>And a twisted Past:</strong> Well known physicist Prof. Michio Kaku (mkaku.org) in a conversation about the dark side of nuclear energy, detailed various little-known nuclear mishaps from earlier decades, including a Soviet incident that happened in the Ural Mountains in the 1950&#8217;s, which he called &#8220;the mother-of-all nuclear accidents before Chernobyl.&#8221; The reactor was actually in flames and entire villages had to be evacuated, he noted.<br />
&#8220;I would say I&#8217;m critical of nuclear power,&#8221; Kaku said, pointing out that having a potentially unstable reactor near a large population center such as Indian Point (which is 20 miles away from New York City) creates a dangerous scenario. </p>
<p><strong>Hidden Costs:</strong> It is not possible to calculate or predict precisely the costs in terms of serious illness, loss of productivity, the negative toll on the body and mind of fear, multi-generational genetically cascading DNA corruption, devaluation of property Etc. and the myriad of ways that those costs will be heaped upon and accumulate in, on and around the Planet’s population of humans, all life-forms and the entirety of both autonomous holdings and ‘the commons’. We do know with certainty that exposure to the forms of invisible pollution particularly related to: daily exhaust, routine emissions, the ever-spreading ‘warm contaminants’, frequent ‘minor emergencies’ and major incidents which are absolutely inherent in the operation of modern nuclear generating and defense/offence installations are of the most serious kind and by a very large degree, the most persistent (virtually ‘forever’ is a very long time) influence that [some] people choose to force on all life for all time. Radioactive waste is expensive to dispose of, contain or move, so unscrupulous contractors slip it into unguarded, unapproved places. And ‘hot’ waste easily ‘hides in plain sight’, that is, it’s invisible, or visually indistinguishable from safe stuff. Because of these factors dangerously radioactive consumer goods and building materials have already spread covertly into the homes of people around the world.<br />
<a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-15.jpg' title='nuke waste 15'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-15.thumbnail.jpg' alt='nuke waste 15' /></a></p>
<p> In the future we won’t know if the neighborhood park is a hot spot, certainly some will be. What is the cost of scanning every item purchased (including food) and scanning every location visited with a Geiger counter?</p>
<p><strong>The Need:</strong> Some say we need to include the nuke sector in our ‘energy mix’.  A peek at reality easily demonstrates that there actually is no correlation between nuclear generating facilities and our electricity requirements. The true correlation is between nuke plants and the further enrichment of corporations/control of the people. The corporate monsters and their governmental attendants see nukes as the ideal utility: they are [marketed as] highly technical, (so the people can’t understand them) and they are centralized, (keeping people reliant on some un-challengeable royal provider). </p>
<p>Mr. Obama says that he would like to up the nuke loan guarantees (giveaways) to almost 60 BILLION. I’ll bet he does not plan to retire to Georgia where the first new nukes are planned.<br />
One must be stupid, ignorant and/or hugely corrupt to back a nuclear renaissance. No disrespect intended, I&#8217;m a nice guy and I&#8217;m kida&#8217; stupid and certainly ignorant in some arias. Stupidity and ignorance are not positive traits in a leader, but are not [necessarily] character flaws. Large scale corruption however is indefensible!</p>
<p><strong>&#8230; And there is so much more wrong</strong> with atom splitting and uranium concentrating. Our upstanding new President, who certainly does not look stupid to me claims that the U. S. must Nuke-it-Up because other countries are increasingly Nuke friendly. This point of view begs the questions &#8220;Should we also veil our women like Iran, Eat our dogs like Korea, Harvest organs (not the musical ones) from healthy citizens like China and Mexico?&#8221;</p>
<p>Watching some of the insane directives coming out of the new White House, and really wanting to like a President, I am forming a theory and trying desperately to sell myself on it:</p>
<p>The nuclear issue is one of those telltale issues which can provide insight into the intent (and sometimes the sanity) of an administrator.</font> </p>
<p><font color="#009966">The working theory:</p>
<p>If we can accept that (at least it is my assertion) one must be stupid, ignorant and/or corrupt to propose the building a bunch of new nuclear plants, and yet would like to think that Mr. Obama is certainly not stupid, is not ignorant and is not corrupt, or at least he was not more corrupt than his professional peers before he got the job, then what is he really doing with this insane giveaway to the Nukers? </p>
<p><strong>Why is this intelligent man, with huge responsibilities warming up to ‘future- killing’ nukes?</strong></p>
<p> Yes, I know he has shamefully lied to us, saying that the nukes will be clean (LIE), green (not possible) carbon free (not even close) and economically viable (impossible for several obvious reasons, not the least of which is the unaccounted-for cost of containing and monitoring the waste and burned out plants in perpetuity). But I would like to think this intelligent attorney knows better, but can’t be ‘real’, the job won’t allow it. The job comes with frustrating limitations, directives and with a built-in system of bargaining and trade-off deals which no President in modern times has been able to circumvent and live to tell about.  </p>
<p>So what if Mr. Obama does indeed understand the obvious, that nukes solve nothing which needs solving, and in fact create virtually NEVER ENDING problems, escalating expenses and threaten the well-being (absolutely guarantee profound injury) of the planet and her inhabitants on a scale grater than, well, I guess any other goofy idea born of the human mind? What if he does understand that nuking-up will certainly graphically illustrate a slipping into idiocy on a governmental scale… But because throughout much of his political career he has been heavily funded by nuke friendly corporations, and now his staff, circle of advisers and various agencies have a scary percentage of nuke-supporters, and given all of the pressures from the super-rich who run the show, as well as his apparent strong desire to woo Republican cooperation he feels he too must ‘cooperate’ with the overwhelmingly ‘nuke-friendly’ Repubs and conservatives.</p>
<p><strong>It is quite possible</strong> that the position Mr. Obama finds himself in is so utterly controlled by uncontrollable forces that he can find no way out of acting in support of nuclear nonsense. </p>
<p><strong>He needs our help. We need our help. </strong></p>
<p>I suspect that even for a high level insider (which we may assume Mr. Obama already was a few years ago) that the very first briefing (after the election / before inauguration) was an eye-opener and mind-blower, and that, like his predecessors, whatever the new guy’s aspirations might be, he learns, not long after the election, that he is not the boss, not even close. I remember that Jimmy Carter said something like, “I learned the corporations tell the President what to do on my first full day in office”. </p>
<p>If the inside situation is something like this, then the person and the parent and the President, Barak Obama is counting on us. He can’t SAY NO TO NUKES even though he knows better, but we can, and we must. For so many reasons and for the sake of so many, for so many years to come, <strong>we must SAY NO TO NUKES.</strong></p>
<p>The President needs our help like few throughout history have ever needed the people’s help. </p>
<p><strong>Imagine that he knows better, he knows that his proposals, if realized, will char the planet that his own children want to live on, but ‘the powers that be’ will not allow him to act in a responsible manner.<br />
It is up to us to save The President’s kids.<br />
It is up to us to save The President’s kids.</strong></p>
<p>It’s easy to take pot-shots at public figures, it is a constitutional right. Just tune into almost any conservative radio, TV or blog and witness a belligerent, mean-hearted, counterproductive abuse of this right.<br />
I have used some direct, descriptive words, but do not feel, or intend to transmit any disrespect or of lack of appreciation.<br />
When a candidate assumes the position of figurehead of our country, he enters into a partnership with the people. Now we must work together. We (the people) have the most important job of putting power and support behind positive movements and kicking the wind out of contrary ones. Left to itself, Washington will repeatedly demonstrate what it has become… As some say, “A wholly owned subsidiary of greedy corporations”. When we allow that to happen, the damage done is our fault. If we let the senseless nuke thing get any more out of hand, what will we tell the kids? How could we defend our apathy?<br />
Please, if you recognize any of the many problems associated with nukes or can grasp even a hint of how economically backwards is the idea, lend your efforts, if only your name on a petition, add your voice to the ‘collective voice of reason’. It’s the only hope the kids have.<br />
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!<br />
Billy  </p>
<p>To make it easy to help get things moving in a better direction I have provided a few links below… With just a few clicks you can lend much needed and much appreciated support.</a></p>
<p><font color="#3300FF">And:</p>
<p>In case you choose not to help stop Nuclear Insanity and to thank you for your attention, for your convenience, I have provided a letter of explanation that you may use to explain your position to your descendants. You’ll find it right below the support links.</a></p>
<p><font color="#660033">Tell President Obama not to risk our future with loan guarantees for the nuclear industry:</p>
<p>How to help everyone,<br />
How to help The President,<br />
How to save the grandkids:<br />
Easy email form, just click to email the President: <a href="http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/1488/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=908">Easy email form, just click to email the President:</a></p>
<p>`<br />
Tell President Obama:<br />
&#8220;Stop nuclear loan guarantees!&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.nonukesyall.org/Action_Obama_2010.2.16.html"> Click here: Your letter will be sent to The President</a></p>
<p>`<br />
Please sign the Petition to Stop the Nuclear Bailout:<br />
Go to: <a href="http://www.nukefree.org/petition"><br />
Just type your name, click send and you’re done. Thanks!</a></p>
<p>Stop Nuclear Power Expansion&#8212;Call Your Senator<br />
Please phone your U.S. Senator as soon as possible on Monday and urge her/him to vote against a &#8220;Sense of the Senate&#8221; resolution that would build support for expanding nuclear power, especially if your Senator serves on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Particular attention is being paid to Sen. Jean Shaheen of New Hampshire.<br />
Urge support for an expansion of energy efficiency and renewable sources of electricity, such as wind, solar, and geothermal.<br />
Call the central Congressional office office at (202) 224-3121.</a><br />
<a href="http://nukefree.org/news/">StopNuclearPowerExpansionCallYourSenator</a> </p>
<p>`<br />
<font color="#6600CC">Letter of explanation that you may use to explain your position (choosing not to resist the deadly Nuclear Renaissance) to your descendants:</p>
<p><strong>Letter to the grandkids (the future):<br />
Back to the Future,</strong></p>
<p>Dear Aquarians,<br />
Well, we got through that sensationalized 2012 thing and the Earth is still spinning, but I sense that things could be a lot more comfortable for you had we never fooled around with atom splitting, or at least, if after Hiroshima and Chernobyl we would have cut our losses. We could not have made the mountains and oceans of radioactive waste go away, as you know, (now many centuries after my generation and the one before us tried to &#8216;fool Mother Nature&#8217;) there is still no solution, but conditions on our beloved Earth might well be much more conducive to good health, happiness, economic stability and broad cooperation of her nations if we had stopped that Nuclear Renaissance early in the 21st century. Many of my peers knew better than to support that backwards movement, and some worked feverishly to ‘stop the insanity’, but [I fear] it wasn’t enough. I know now, that many of the thoughtful anti-nuke/pro-life activists did not even fully understand the technology, but did understand that everything made by man fails and that failures and even small glitches with systems using highly radioactive materials would injure all life-forms for all time, and it was easy for them to understand that such a sentence delivered to everyone for all time, whatever the claimed need, was simply not acceptable.<br />
From my ‘freer perspective’ I too now clearly see that we, back at the turn of the 20th – 21st centuries never did really ‘gamble with nuclear folly’ (gamble with your welfare) as some clamed, because in fact, we had a sure-thing. Everyone at the time, save a miniscule percentage of the population suffering from profound mental handicaps, had the intellect to grasp the blindingly obvious facts about nuclear games which are so graphically illustrated in what is left of the world around you and the bodies of the people in your suffering society. Long before that primitive time early in the 21st century, when the fateful Nuclear Renaissance was proposed there were mountains of irrefutable evidence/proof regarding the negative aspects of ‘radioactive experimentation’. All humans had measurable levels of radioactive contamination in their bodies, mothers passed it along in breast milk and fathers, through their sperm. Simple lab tests could accurately pinpoint the age of a person by measuring the percentage and calibrating the placement of radioactive markers in teeth and bones. There really wasn’t an argument… The corporate government invented one. We could all understand the connection, yet some of us used everything at our disposal to put reality out of our minds. In our (my) defense, it was a scary and confusing time. It was the infancy of the age of hyper-information and there were ten counters to every story. Everything that our fathers had counted on for stability was changing, for a while there, it seemed like the whole of society was crumbling… I’m surprised that the race survived at all, though not in very good condition I see. It may be hard for people of your time (when neuro-empathetic communication is the norm, and ‘privacy’ is only an historic artifact) to imagine, but, back then many people did not think for themselves. Many of us relied on mainstream news for information and to feed us opinion. Back then, what was called ‘the news’ was (for the most part) actually a twisted form of low class entertainment authored and programmed by ruthless, selfish, money-worshiping corporate enterprises, the same forces that controlled the governments. As things became extremely confusing and our ability to reason diminished, in large part because of the compounding stressors, including pollutions of many (new to the species) kinds, and not the least of which was propagandized, implanted fear and frankly, measurable levels of radiological contamination from the very sloppy technology at the heart of this matter… some of us fell into apathy and too many others relinquished any remaining hint of critical thinking ability, ‘donned the sheep skin’ so to speak and followed the herd in any direction that the political faces pushed. As what is now history to you demonstrates, that was a big mistake since the political faces were (could only be) the puppets of the most gratuitously greedy among us. The greed was so extreme that they knowingly sold the well-being of their very own children and grandchildren for bigger yachts. The country called the United States enjoyed the greatest opportunity to move things in a healthy direction, the powers controlling its government effectively did just the opposite. I know now that it was lazy of me to choose my temporal comfort and to render whole huge tracts of the only Earth uninhabitable, at the price of your health and happiness. Please know that the news and the leaders assured us that the juice required to fire up TV screens and operate the ski-lifts and casinos flowed necessarily from nuclear generating facilities. Many among us at the time knew that wasn’t so, indeed, there had been, since at least the mid-20th century, numerous proven technologies which were relatively clean, green and renewable, they were ruthlessly blacklisted, slandered and suppressed. Actually, we could have lived very comfortably without any nukes and even without burning much more coal, but the situation was not portrayed that way. Even if nukes would have been essential to the provision of our creature-comforts, clearly it would not have been worth the price that you and the bleeding world you have inherited now pay.<br />
For the apathy, the carelessness and the selfish decisions of myself and many of my 21st century brothers and sisters I sincerely apologize from the bottom of my heart. The way I understand it… we can’t go back, we cannot undo the assaults of our mistakes, I wish we could, or at least I wish I had been among those who resisted the nuclear invasion, then it would be much easier to face you now. And you know, we could have stopped it if more of us had just gotten up off our pastry-stuffed butts and said NO!<br />
<a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/planet-earth-nestled-in-gentle-cupped-hands.jpg' title='Planet Earth Nestled In Gentle Cupped Hands'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/planet-earth-nestled-in-gentle-cupped-hands.thumbnail.jpg' alt='Planet Earth Nestled In Gentle Cupped Hands' /></a><br />
My generation inherited a world that needed some work, but the planet was still relatively healthy, and a darn nice place to live. Some of the folks of those few generations changed all that with unprecedented speed. Now I can see that the Human race does indeed qualify as intelligent life, yet is not nearly smart enough to fool around with radioactivity without hurting someone, everyone. Back in the day we did a lot of stuff ‘just because we could’. What a shame.<br />
Please Aquarians, if you can find it in your hearts, forgive me, and if you can’t, well I don’t blame you, but please, don’t do something ‘just because you can’ without knowing beyond the shadow of a doubt that the consequences are completely benign.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
-  Your Name Here -, One of those who just let it happen.</a></p>
<p>&#8220;`<br />
<font color="#000099"> <strong>A little more on waste:</strong><br />
The U.S. Department of Energy and their friends who make money on Nuke business have been working diligently to lower the standards for disposal of ‘hot waste’, they want the relaxed regulations to allow the dumping of the greatest volume of nuke waste in the same neighborhood landfills that your worn-out tennis shoes rest in. This would mean that most of the stuff, (that is not the actual ‘fuel rods’), the stuff that makes people sick before it kills them (as opposed to the stuff that kills in seconds) could legally be layered in open landfills, eventually covered over with no signage or records (many saturated landfills become the foundations of shopping malls, parks or residential housing developments). The same level of ‘lethal’ radioactive gunk could be mixed into more (unlabeled) consumer products. It could even be spread on cropland. All of these illegitimate insults upon ‘the commons’ already take place, but it’s not quite legal yet. If the ‘glowing’ renaissance becomes a reality these practices will accelerate by many orders a magnitude, there would be no choice, the crap is already stored temporarily all around the world, and many huge tracts of land have become what the industry and the feds call ‘sacrificed land’, permanently. I honestly think that if people had an idea of how much deadly hot stuff is currently spread around we would not be having this worn-out argument.<br />
`<br />
<strong>A little more about how it hurts:</strong><br />
For that past two years the health care debate has been the most consistent story in the U.S., with all kinds of proposals and arguments about: who, how, when, why and if, and with scarcely any mention or meaningful discussion of the importance of keeping people well in the first place. Here, in one of the only TWO countries in the world where Big Pharma is allowed to push drugs directly to the public, we would, if we had reasonable collective wisdom and/or legitimate representation act upon the understanding that there isn’t enough wealth in the world to nurse everyone if everyone is sick all the time…Here, where we do so much to make people sick and keep people sick, the last thing we need is to promote, or even tolerate the existence of an industry which automatically lowers the ‘health quotient’ of all citizens to the extent that humans are now born with a strike against them (the fetus suffers from ‘minor’ radiation damage), into a world suffering from an unprecedented high level of toxicity, with no clean space left, and beyond the extent that we can even estimate in terms of severity and duration. This industry produces unavoidable side-effects resulting in part from its unique brand of pollution which is stealthy, insidious and ever-enduring. </p>
<p><strong>The pollution which is inevitably tied to nukes</strong> occasionally kills people instantly or quickly and often kills some people (those working in, or in close proximity to facilities) more slowly. In addition, the general nuclear contamination which is now systemic to the whole of our planet represents a ‘negative stressor’ upon the bodies of everyone living here. Even people, other animals and plants in the farthest undeveloped reaches of Earth suffer from man-made radiation poisoning. It’s bad enough that the people using the electricity coming from nukes live sicker and shorter lives, and can offer noting better to their children, but imagine how unfair it is to spread ‘Nuclear Disease’ to subsistence, in-balance people living a sustainable life in Amazonia or remote Tibet. How do our American natives feel to have this happen on their continent? Much of the uranium mining necessarily takes place on the most undesirable patches of American Homeland, those places to where the natives were herded, the reservations.<br />
Every living thing on Earth suffers from man-made radiation poisoning which expresses itself in a myriad of individual conditions and as an amplification of all ill conditions. Science has found no way to intervene in a helpful way. The very existence of nukes (generating plants and defense/offence installations) pollutes the planet every moment of every day. There is no known way to stop it, no solution to the deadly influences just from what we have already built. </p>
<p>To build any more nukes, knowing what we know, would be terrorism, murder and clearly qualify as an act of war. </p>
<p><strong>In fact wasting any more time and energy on nuke debates even just with regards to shutting down all the radioactive monsters currently ‘cooking us’, is immoral.</strong> To invest more in this ‘proven-failed’ technology would surely break the bank. The problematic side effects resulting from the ridiculous practice of using radioactivity to boil water are dramatic to say the least, they hurt us in terms of physical, emotional and mental well-being, in terms of freedom (parts of formerly pristine Utah, Nevada and New Mexico are forever off-limits and have been sacrificed to the god of nuclear insanity till the end of geological time, and much of the Middle East is now blanketed in radioactive dust). The bankrupting would exert its ruination in economically relevant ways as well.<br />
<strong>In fact the whole of the nuclear power thing has never, in its entire history paid off for the people.</strong> The whole industry and every move it has made has been paid for by the people with; tax breaks, tax credits, subsidies, liability caps, risk insurance, anti-trust exemptions, shutdown subsidies, people funded decommissionings and defaulted superfund clean-ups, and the list goes on… and on.<br />
The Truth about Toxic Waste Cleanups: How EPA Is Misleading the Public about the Superfund Program</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uspirg.org/home/reports/report-archives/healthy-communities/healthy-communities/the-truth-about-toxic-waste-cleanups-how-epa-is-misleading-the-public-about-the-superfund-program"> The Truth About Toxic Waste Cleanups: How EPA Is Misleading The Public About The Superfund Program</a></p>
<p>The people pay dearly, the corporations reap the profits, many politicians get their cut, the sell-out continues and the world keeps getting smaller and scarier.</p>
<p>But it doesn’t have to continue this way.</p>
<p>We can turn it around today.</p>
<p><strong>Our representatives have a tough time of it; the system makes it very difficult to rise above, though a few appear to manage it.</strong> The thing that can save us, save the kids is our voice and our resolve. Every meaningful improvement to the workings of government comes from the people, from the street, from a collective of individuals willing to <strong>‘Speak Truth to Power’.</strong> That still works.<br />
This time though there is a huge propaganda/programming campaign which has infected the thinking of the masses that must be overcome before some of us can think clearly on the issue. It must first be understood that we cannot rely on Washington (or its counterpart in other countries) or on mainstream news for the facts. That’s no longer a limitation as independent sources that accept no corporate funding or conventional sponsorship are readily accessible.</p>
<p>Television Without Borders | Link TV</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linktv.org/">Television Without Borders | Link TV</a></p>
<p>Free Speech TV | Powered by Our Viewers</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freespeech.org/">Free Speech TV | Powered by Our Viewers</a> </p>
<p>Democracy Now</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democracynow.org/">Democracy Now</a></p>
<p>Thom Hartmann<br />
<a href="https://www.thomhartmann.com/"> Thom Hartmann</a></p>
<p><strong>We could continue the debate</strong>, or we could wisely use any one of the many factually irrefutable problems for which there is currently no solution what so ever as the reason to ‘stop the insanity’ in its tracks. I can easily site over a dozen distinct problems with the technology for which there is no solution on the horizon. It only takes one fault in a plan to render the plan a failure, with nukes we have many, and they are big. For those who insist on ignoring reality, to be fair, you cannot use the empty rhetoric about “solutions that will be developed”, that simply demonstrates irresponsibility. When the stakes are this big (Insuring disease for everyone, poisoning the planet in the most hideous way and risking virtual annihilation) you cannot take chances. Under the rules of responsible behavior, you may not create a problem unless and until you fully develop the solution. And we must understand the meaning of ‘solution’. For instance when a nuclear-fueled country claims that their solution to ‘low level’ waste (a very deceiving term) is to bury it or ship it to Africa, we see that the country has not consulted Webster. Moving the poison or placing it inside a dynamic, living, planet in flux may be and answer (though a poor one), but it most certainly is no solution.</p>
<p><strong>Dear Mr. President, fellow Americans and Planetary brothers and sisters,</strong><br />
When the pro-nukes among you are ready to prove SOLUTIONS to every problem created by nukes we will have the food for a productive discussion. At the moment, lacking solutions, there is nothing to discus on the issue. So may I suggest that we put our heads together get on with something productive?     </p>
<p>Most respectfully,</p>
<p>Billy  </p>
<p>The Truth About Toxic Waste Cleanups: How EPA Is Misleading The Public About The Superfund Program<br />
<a href="http://www.uspirg.org/home/reports/report-archives/healthy-communities/healthy-communities/the-truth-about-toxic-waste-cleanups-how-epa-is-misleading-the-public-about-the-superfund-program"> The Truth About Toxic Waste Cleanups: How EPA Is Misleading The Public About The Superfund Program</a></p>
<p><strong>No Real Support:</strong><br />
<strong>For all of its worn out rhetoric about the importance of free enterprise</strong> and the and self-balancing nature of the free market system, the U.S. government does not actually support such a system. Probably the best example of the forked tongue on this point is the tight bond between the feds and the nuke corporations.<br />
<strong>Without the life giving, life sustaining umbilical through which ‘the people’s’ money flows reliably to the nukes, there would be no nukes.</strong> I don’t think that there is an economist or a sane investor in the world who would put up his own green to get a piece of something so red. This is not the free market working its magic; it’s the same old ‘special interest’ system at work. There is nothing free about it for the people, and while big-ticket slight-of-hand is at work, there is really no magic. Supporting this view is commentary from Amory B. Lovins, chief scientist of the Rocky Mountain Institute, in March 2008 before the [House of Representatives of the U.S.] Select Committee on Energy Independence (rmi.org). His thesis: “expanding nuclear power would reduce and retard climate protection and energy security…but can’t survive free-market capitalism.”</p>
<p>Making his case with brilliant concision, Lovins, a consultant to business and the Defense Department, demonstrated with numbers and other data that nuclear power “is being dramatically outcompeted in the global marketplace by no and low-carbon power resources that deliver far more climate solution per dollar, far faster.”</p>
<p>Lovins doesn’t even include the accident or sabotage risks. He testified that “because it’s [nuclear power] uneconomic and unnecessary, we needn’t inquire into its other attributes.” Renewable energy (eg. wind power), cogeneration and energy efficiencies (megawatts) are now far superior to maintain.  </p>
<p><strong>Percent?:</strong><br />
Not many years ago the official claim was that nukes provided between 8% and 11% of U.S. electricity, now they say ‘nearly’ 20 percent, it’s always fuzzy, and remember that electricity is not equivalent to energy. We harness and use many times more units of ‘energy’ that we don’t use as electricity. Still, if the 20% were honestly adjusted to include the ‘payback’ for the fossil fuel consumed in the process of getting a nuke to the point of producing electrical energy from the nuclear reaction, the number would be smaller by about one half (10, maybe 11%). Now if we could accurately factor in the energy costs of all the peripheral expenditures, the number would fall quite dramatically further. We can’t do that accurately of course, but we can see that the number would be very small, though maybe still to the right-of-zero (a positive number). If however we could see the whole mess from a wide vantage, we would not have to project very far into the future, including the after-costs (waste containment issues, sickness and related health care, real estate sacrificed and so on) to drop the real number below zero. At that point, for all our gargantuan investment in nuclear power, it pays nothing back. It leaves us with a NEGATIVE BALANCE energy wise.<br />
We quickly reach a negative number without even factoring in the inevitable terrorist attacks and accidents.<br />
The weird thing is: the more nukes we build, the quicker we reach the negative numbers and the deeper to the left of zero we go.<br />
That’s the reality and there can really be no argument, it’s not an exact calculation but the direction is clear. We don’t know exactly how much we will pay for ‘less-than-nothing’ in return, but we can see that it’s not a fair deal. This little slice of reality is not a good selling point for the nukies.   </p>
<p><strong>Oh yeah, one more easy way to help:</strong></p>
<p>Help the &#8220;Nuclear Renaissance&#8221; Crumble<br />
Dear Friends,<br />
Here&#8217;s a quick, handy action help the &#8220;nuclear renaissance&#8221; crumble!<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
Though Bush&#8217;s fantasy &#8220;nuclear renaissance&#8221; appears to meltdown before our eyes as 19 of 27 announced new nuclear reactors are cancelled or tabled in favor of efficiency and alternatives, a few reactors are unfortunately still rockin&#8217; along in the second year of the new administration.<br />
Notably, Southern Co.&#8217;s Vogtle reactors in Georgia and SCG&#038;E&#8217;s Summer reactors in South Carolina are first in line with hands out for TAXPAYER-FUNDED loan guarantees which are reported to be rolling out from U.S. Department of Energy very soon. Besides the obvious socialism involved with bailing out the faltering nuclear industry, the reactors proposed for both projects are the ill-fated Westinghouse AP1000 design, just sent back to the drawing board for at least one year for serious safety concerns by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.<br />
ACTION!<br />
E-mail U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu at: The.Secretary@hq.doe.gov<br />
Title your e-mail: NO LOAN GUARANTEES FOR AP1000 PROJECTS<br />
Copy and paste the sample letter below, or write your own, but DO IT TODAY!!! Stop the Speeding Nuclear Bailout!!<br />
SAMPLE LETTER:<br />
Dear Energy Secretary Chu,<br />
I am writing you to ask that you stop immediate payouts from the ill-advised taxpayer-funded nuclear loan guarantee program, an out-of-step legacy from the Bush administration&#8217;s fantasy &#8220;nuclear renaissance.&#8221;<br />
Two Westinghouse AP1000 reactor proposals, in Georgia and in South Carolina, are the only remaining hold-outs of the rush to announce new reactors in recent years. Most of the new reactors have been cancelled or tabled in the face of better alternatives and escalating financial risks for nuclear reactors.<br />
The ongoing interest of South Carolina Gas &#038; Electric to add reactors at Summer in South Carolina and of Southern Company to build reactors at Vogtle in Georgia is maintained solely by the unwholesome enticement of taxpayer-funded loan guarantees promised by the U.S. Department of Energy.<br />
SCG&#038;E and Southern Co. have both testified before their respective Public Service Commissions that they persist in pursuing nuclear power because they &#8220;don&#8217;t want to lose their place in line at the DOE.&#8221;<br />
The unfinished and unlicensed AP1000 reactor design has been, as you are aware, sent back to the drawing board for deep revisions by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.<br />
Dr. Chu, your work with renewable energy at DOE speaks for itself. Non-poisonous renewable energy sources are ready to free us from the security risks and environmental degradation of nuclear and coal.<br />
I beg you to use the power of your office to protect U.S. taxpayers from bad investments in drawing-board nuclear reactors.<br />
Respectfully, e your name and address &#8230; you may receive a reply)<br />
<a href="http://www.nukefree.org/news/helpthenuclearrenaissancecrumble">Send your letter</a></p>
<p>PEACE!<br />
Billy   EarthRising.org </p>
<p>Sources include:.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a><br />
Union of Concerned Scientists<br />
Nuclear Power</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/">http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/ </a></p>
<p>U.S. Government Accounting Office<br />
<a href="http://www.gao.gov/">http://www.gao.gov/ </a></p>
<p>Helen Caldicott, MD<br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm </a><br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm </a></p>
<p>Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)</p>
<p>Green America<br />
<a href="http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm">http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5<br />
">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/">http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/ </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478">http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478 </a></p>
<p>DemocracyNow<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose">http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose </a></p>
<p>3 mile island today<br />
<ahref="http://www.google.com/search?q=3+mile+island+today&#038;hl=en&#038;tbs=tl:1&#038;tbo=u&#038;ei=9HqOS5ngMI3esgP0koCxCA&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=timeline_result&#038;ct=title&#038;resnum=16&#038;ved=0CDMQ5wIwDw">3 mile island today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/static/1979/1979-story24.htm<br />
"> THE TRUTH ABOUT THREE MILE ISLAND &#8230;<br />
      AND OTHER NUCLEAR &#8220;INCIDENTS&#8221;</a></p>
<p>New revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety<a href="http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A393821<br />
"> The truth behind the meltdown </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mothersalert.org/bertell.html ">3 MILE ISLAND COVER-UP:<br />
DR. ROSALIE BERTELL&#8217;S SIGNED, NOTARIZED STATEMENT<br />
 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/node/33712"> Ron Paul on Nuclear Power? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html<br />
">http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html<br />
">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm<br />
">http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html   "> Chernobyl </a></p>
<p><a href="http://sites.nationalacademies.org/NRC/index.htm<br />
"> National Research Council </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-final-nail-in-the-pro-nuclear-argument/ "> Grist Magazine</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nukefree.org/"> nukefree.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nonukes.org/"> nonukes.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.biofuelswatch.com/obama-contradicts-himself/"> biofuelswatch.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/5611-no-nukes-is-good-nukes.html"> pacific free press</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/letter-to-president-obama/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama: </a><br />
<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/the-nuclear-retreat/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>_______________________________________________________</p>
<p><strong>Honest Experts say:</strong></p>
<p>Amory Lovins On Nuclear Power<br />
Democracy Now has an interview with Amory Lovins, looking at way nuclear power is a poor option to choose. Reason number 1 - cost. From Expanding Nuclear Power Makes Climate Change Worse:<br />
AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us. Well, talk about nuclear power. Why do you feel it’s not an option, given the oil crisis?</p>
<p>AMORY LOVINS: Well, first of all, electricity and oil have essentially nothing to do with each other, and anybody who thinks the contrary is really ignorant about energy. Less than two percent of our electricity is made from oil. Less than two percent of our oil makes electricity. Those numbers are falling. And essentially, all the oil involved is actually the heavy, gooey bottom of the barrel you can’t even make mobility fuels out of anyway.</p>
<p>What nuclear would do is displace coal, our most abundant domestic fuel. And this sounds good for climate, but actually, expanding nuclear makes climate change worse, for a very simple reason. Nuclear is incredibly expensive. The costs have just stood up on end lately. Wall Street Journal recently reported that they’re about two to four times the cost that the industry was talking about just a year ago. And the result of that is that if you buy more nuclear plants, you’re going to get about two to ten times less climate solution per dollar, and you’ll get it about twenty to forty times slower, than if you buy instead the cheaper, faster stuff that is walloping nuclear and coal and gas, all kinds of central plans, in the marketplace. And those competitors are efficient use of electricity and what’s called micropower, which is both renewables, except big hydro, and making electricity and heat together, in fact, recent buildings, which takes about half of the money, fuel and carbon of making them separately, as we normally do.</p>
<p>So, nuclear cannot actually deliver the climate or the security benefits claimed for it. It’s unrelated to oil. And it’s grossly uneconomic, which means the nuclear revival that we often hear about is not actually happening. It’s a very carefully fabricated illusion. And the reason it isn’t happening is there are no buyers. That is, Wall Street is not putting a penny of private capital into the industry, despite 100-plus percent subsidies.</p>
<p>AMY GOODMAN: Why?</p>
<p>AMORY LOVINS: It’s uneconomic. It costs, for example, about three times as much as wind power, which is booming.</p>
<p>Let me give you some numbers about what’s happening in the marketplace, because that’s reality, as far as I’m concerned. I really take markets seriously. 2006, the last full year of data we have, nuclear worldwide added a little bit of capacity, more than all of it from upgrading old plants, because the new ones they built were smaller than the retirements of old plants. So they added 1.4 billion watts. Sounds like a lot. Well, it’s about one big plant’s worth worldwide. That was less than photovoltaics, solar cells added in capacity. It was a tenth what wind power added. It was a thirtieth to a fortieth of what micropower added.</p>
<p>AMY GOODMAN: What’s micropower?</p>
<p>AMORY LOVINS: Again, it’s renewables, other than big hydro, plus co-generating electricity and heat together, usually in industry.</p>
<p>In 2006, micropower, for the first time, produced more electricity worldwide than nuclear did. A sixth of the world’s electricity is now micropower, a third of the new electricity. In a dozen industrial countries, micropower makes anywhere from a sixth to over half of all the electricity elsewhere. This is not a fringe activity anymore.</p>
<p>China, which has the world’s most ambitious nuclear program, by the end of 2006 had seven times that much capacity in distributed renewables, and they were growing it seven times faster. Take a look at 2007, in which the US or Spain or China added more wind capacity than the world added nuclear capacity. The US added more wind capacity last year than we’ve added coal capacity in the past five years put together.</p>
<p>And renewables, other than big hydro, got last year $71 billion of private capital; nuclear, as usual, got zero. It is only bought by central planners with a draw on the public purse. What does this tell you? I mean, what part of the story does anybody who take markets seriously not get?</p>
<p>AMY GOODMAN: And yet, well, the media clearly in this country doesn’t get it, because it is raised over and over again by the candidates. I mean, it seems that Senator McCain has a favorite number: a hundred years in Iraq, also hoping for a hundred more new nuclear power plants. He had said something about, he doesn’t want to lose the knowledge of building, since the last one was built more than thirty years ago; the people are dying who had built it, so we’ve got to rush and build them now.</p>
<p>AMORY LOVINS: Well, you could say that’s already been lost, in the sense that most of a nuclear plant built now in the US, if there were any, would have to be imported, which, by the way, means we buy it in weak US dollars, which is part of the incredible cost escalation we’ve seen. Moody’s latest number is $7,500 a kilowatt. That’s, again, as the Journal said, about two to four times the numbers that were being bandied about just last year by promoters. </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s Atomic Blunder<br />
by Harvey Wasserman<br />
As Vermont seethes with radioactive contamination and the Democratic Party crumbles, Barack Obama has plunged into the atomic abyss.<br />
In the face of fierce green opposition and withering scorn from both liberal and conservative budget hawks, Obama has done what George W. Bush could not&#8212;pledge billions of taxpayer dollars for a relapse of the 20th Century&#8217;s most expensive technological failure.<br />
Obama has announced some $8.3 billion in loan guarantees for two new reactors planned for Georgia. Their Westinghouse AP-1000 designs have been rejected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as being unable to withstand natural cataclysms like hurricanes, tornadoes and earthquakes.<br />
The Vogtle site was to originally host four reactors at a total cost of $600 million; it wound up with two at $9 billion.<br />
The Southern Company which wants to build these two new reactors has cut at least one deal with Japanese financiers set to cash in on American taxpayer largess. The interest rate on the federal guarantees remains bitterly contested. The funding is being debated between at least five government agencies, and may well be tested in the courts. It&#8217;s not clear whether union labor will be required and what impact that might have on construction costs.<br />
The Congressional Budget Office and other analysts warn the likely failure rate for government-back reactor construction loans could be in excess of 50%. Energy Secretary Stephen Chu has admitted he was unaware of the CBO&#8217;s report when he signed on to the Georgia guarantees.<br />
Over the past several years the estimated price tag for proposed new reactors has jumped from $2-3 billion each in some cases to more than $12 billion today. The Chair of the NRC currently estimates it at $10 billion, well before a single construction license has been issued, which will take at least a year.<br />
Energy experts at the Rocky Mountain Institute and elsewhere estimate that a dollar invested in increased efficiency could save as much as seven times as much energy than one invested in nuclear plants can produce, while producing ten times as many permanent jobs.<br />
Georgia has been targeted largely because its regulators have demanded ratepayers put up the cash for the reactors as they&#8217;re being built. Florida and Georgia are among a small handful of states taxing electric consumers for projects that cannot come on line for many years, and that may never deliver a single electron of electricity.<br />
Two Florida Public Service Commissioners, recently appointed by Republican Governor Charlie Crist (now a candidate for the US Senate), helped reject over a billion dollars in rate hikes demanded by Florida Power &#038; Light and Progress Energy, both of which want to build double-reactors at ratepayer expense. The utilities now say they&#8217;ll postpone the projects proposed for Turkey Point and Levy County.<br />
In 2005 the Bush Administration set aside some $18.5 billion for reactor loan guarantees, but the Department of Energy has been unable to administer them. Obama wants an additional $36 billion to bring the fund up to $54.5 billion. Proposed projects in South Carolina, Maryland and Texas appear to be next in line.<br />
But the NRC has raised serious questions about Toshiba-owned Westinghouse&#8217;s AP-1000 slated for Georgia&#8217;s Vogtle site, as well as for South Carolina and Turkey Point. The French-made EPR design proposed for Maryland has been challenged by regulators in Finland, France and Great Britain. In Texas, a $4 billion price jump has sparked a political upheaval in San Antonio and elsewhere, throwing the future of that project in doubt.<br />
Taxpayers are also on the hook for potential future accidents from these new reactors. In 1957, the industry promised Congress and the country that nuclear technology would quickly advance to the point that private insurers would take on the liability for any future disaster, which could by all serious estimates run into the hundreds of billions of dollars. Only $11 billion has been set aside the cover the cost of such a catastrophe. But now the industry says it will not build even this next generation of plants without taxpayers underwriting liability for future accidents. Thus the &#8220;temporary&#8221; program could ultimately stretch out to a full century or more.<br />
In the interim, Obama has all but killed Nevada&#8217;s proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste dump. He has appointed a commission of nuclear advocates to &#8220;investigate&#8221; the future of high-level reactor waste. But after 53 years, the industry is further from a solution than ever.<br />
Meanwhile, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has reported that at least 27 of America&#8217;s 104 licensed reactors are now leaking radioactive tritium. The worst case may be Entergy&#8217;s Vermont Yankee, near the state&#8217;s southeastern border with New Hampshire and Massachusetts. High levels of contamination have been found in test wells around the reactor, and experts believe the Connecticut River is at serious risk.<br />
A furious statewide grassroots campaign aims to shut the plant, whose license expires in 2012. A binding agreement between Entergy and the state gives the legislature the power to deny an extension. US Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has demanded the plant close. The legislature may vote on it in a matter of days.<br />
Obama has now driven a deep wedge between himself and the core of the environmental movement, which remains fiercely anti-nuclear. While reactor advocates paint the technology green, the opposition has been joined by fiscal conservatives like the National Taxpayer Institute, the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation.<br />
Reactor backers hailing a &#8220;renaissance&#8221; in atomic energy studiously ignore France&#8217;s catastrophic Olkiluoto project, now $3 billion over budget and 3 years behind schedule. Parallel problems have crippled another project at Flamanville, France, and are virtually certain to surface in the US.<br />
The reactor industry has spent untold millions lobbying for this first round of loan guarantees. There&#8217;s no doubt it will seek far more in the coming months. Having failed to secure private American financing, the question will be: in a tight economy, how much public money will Congress throw at this obsolete technology.<br />
The potential flow of taxpayer guarantees to Georgia means nuclear opponents now have a tangible target. Also guaranteed is ferocious grassroots opposition to financing, licensing and construction of this and all other new reactor proposals, as well as to continued operation of leaky rustbucket reactors like Vermont Yankee.<br />
The &#8220;atomic renaissance&#8221; is still a very long way from going tangibly critical.<br />
Harvey Wasserman is Senior Advisor to Greenpeace USA and the Nuclear Information &#038; Resource Service. His SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH is at www.solartopia.org.  </p>
<p>`<br />
Greenpeace: <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/nuclear">Greenpeace</a><br />
Greenpeace has always fought - and will continue to fight - vigorously against nuclear power because it is an unacceptable risk to the environment and to humanity. The only solution is to halt the expansion of all nuclear power, and for the shutdown of existing plants.<br />
We need an energy system that can fight climate change, based on renewable energy and energy efficiency. Nuclear power already delivers less energy globally than renewable energy, and the share will continue to decrease in the coming years.</p>
<p>Despite what the nuclear industry tells us, building enough nuclear power stations to make a meaningful reduction in greenhouse gas emissions would cost trillions of dollars, create tens of thousands of tons of lethal high-level radioactive waste, contribute to further proliferation of nuclear weapons materials, and result in a Chernobyl-scale accident once every decade. Perhaps most significantly, it will  squander the resources necessary to implement meaningful climate change solutions.  (Briefing: Climate change - Nuclear not the answer.)</p>
<p>`</p>
<p>Union of Concerned Scientists<br />
<a href=" http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/">Union of Concerned Scientists</a>    Nuclear Power Risk<br />
Nuclear Power Safety<br />
Sabotage and Attacks on Reactors<br />
Nuclear Proliferation and Terrorism<br />
Nuclear Power and Global Warming<br />
Nuclear Power Solutions<br />
What You Can Do<br />
Successes<br />
Nuclear Weapons &#038; Global Security </p>
<p><strong>But look at this:</strong><br />
Vermont Senate Votes to Close Nuclear Plant<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/25/us/25nuke.html">Vermont Senate Votes to Close Nuclear Plant</a><br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704240004575085771093093364.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Vermont Senate Votes to Close Nuclear Plant, 2</a><br />
`</p>
<p>36 ways to stop nuclear power <a href="http://www.ecostreet.com/blog/renewable-energy/2007/10/07/36-ways-to-stop-nuclear-power/">36 ways to stop nuclear power</a></p>
<p>`</p>
<p>PEACE! </p>
<p>Billy   EarthRising.org<br />
Thanks for your attention, I know your time is valuable.<br />
I think that says it pretty well, but if you’d like a little more:  </p>
<p>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/"> Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p>`</p>
<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/"> Nuclear mishaps, A short list…</a></p>
<p>From: Bear Market News, Just the Facts: A Look at the Five Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power<br />
This series of educational fact sheets about nuclear power is aimed at refuting some of the central arguments that nuclear power advocates use when advancing their message. Specifically, there are five key reasons why nuclear power is not a solution to the United States’ energy needs: cost, security, safety, waste, and proliferation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/nuclear_power_plants/articles.cfm?ID=13449">Just The Facts: Cost<br />
Just the Facts: Cost</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/nuclear_power_plants/articles.cfm?ID=13451"> Just The Facts: Security<br />
Just the Facts: Security<br />
`<br />
<a href="http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/nuclear_power_plants/articles.cfm?ID=13452"> Just The Facts: Safety<br />
Just the Facts: Safety</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/nuclear_power_plants/articles.cfm?ID=13453"> Just The Facts: Proliferation<br />
Just the Facts: Proliferation</p>
<p><a href="http://www.citizen.org/cmep/energy_enviro_nuclear/nuclear_power_plants/articles.cfm?ID=15422"> Just The Facts: Summary<br />
Just the Facts: Summary</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><strong>Ten More:</strong> Excerpted from ‘Ten Strikes Against Nuclear Power’<br />
@ Green America <a href="http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm">Ten Strikes Against Nuclear Power</a><br />
Currently we draw electric power from about 400 nuclear plants worldwide.  Nuclear proponents say we would have to scale up to around 17,000 nuclear plants to offset enough fossil fuels to begin making a dent in climate change.  This isn’t possible – neither are 2,500 or 3,000 more nuclear plants that many people frightened about climate change suggest.  Here’s why:<br />
________________________________________<br />
1. Nuclear waste &#8212; The waste from nuclear power plants will be toxic for humans for more than 100,000 years.  It’s untenable now to secure and store all of the waste from the plants that exist.  To scale up to 2,500 or 3,000, let alone 17,000 plants is unthinkable.<br />
Nuclear proponents hope that the next generation of nuclear plants will generate much less waste, but this technology is not yet fully developed or proven.  Even if new technology eventually can successful reduce the waste involved, the waste that remains will still be toxic for 100,000 years.  There will be less per plant, perhaps, but likely more overall, should nuclear power scale up to 2,500, 3,000 or 17,000 plants.  No community should have to accept nuclear waste site, or even accept the risks of nuclear waste being transported through on route to its final destination.  The waste problem alone should take nuclear power off the table.<br />
The proposed solution a national nuclear waste storage facility at Yucca Mountain is over budget and won’t provide a safe solution either.  The people of Nevada don’t want that nuclear waste facility there.  Also, we would need to transfer the waste to this facility from plants around the country and drive it there – which puts communities across the country at risk.</p>
<p>2. Nuclear proliferation – In discussing the nuclear proliferation issue, Al Gore said, “During my 8 years in the White House, every nuclear weapons proliferation issue we dealt with was connected to a nuclear reactor program.”  Iran and North Korea are reminding us of this every day.  We can’t develop a domestic nuclear energy program without confronting proliferation in other countries.<br />
Here too, nuclear power proponents hope that the reduction of nuclear waste will reduce the risk of proliferation from any given plant, but again, the technology is not there yet.  If we want to be serious about stopping proliferation in the rest of the world, we need to get serious here at home, and not push the next generation of nuclear proliferation forward as an answer to climate change. There is simply no way to guarantee that nuclear materials will not fall into the wrong hands</p>
<p>3. National Security – Nuclear reactors represent a clear national security risk and an attractive target for terrorists.  In researching the security around nuclear power plants, Robert Kennedy, Jr. found that there are at least eight relatively easy ways to cause a major meltdown at a nuclear power plant.<br />
What’s more, Kennedy has sailed boats right into the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant on the Hudson River outside of New York City not just once but twice, to point out the lack of security around nuclear plants.  The unfortunate fact is that our nuclear power plants remain unsecured, without adequate evacuation plans in the case of an emergency.  Remember the government response to Hurricane Katrina, and cross that with a Chernobyl-style disaster to begin to imagine what a terrorist attack at a nuclear power plant might be like.  </p>
<p>4. Accidents – Forget terrorism for a moment, and remember that mere accidents – human error or natural disasters – can wreak just as much havoc at a nuclear power plant site.  The Chernobyl disaster forced the evacuation and resettlement of nearly 400,000 people, with thousands poisoned by radiation.<br />
Here in the US, the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 triggered a clean-up effort that ultimately lasted for nearly 15 years, and topped more than one billion dollars in cost. The cost of cleaning up after one of these disasters is simply too great, in both dollars and human cost – and if we were to scale up to 17,000 plants, is it reasonable to imagine that not one of them would ever have a single meltdown?   Many nuclear plants are located close to major population centers.  For example, there’s a plant just up the Hudson from New York City.  If there was an accident, evacuation would be impossible.</p>
<p>5. Cancer &#8212; There are growing concerns that living near nuclear plants increases the risk for childhood leukemia and other forms of cancer – even when a plant has an accident-free track record.  One Texas study found increased cancer rates in north central Texas since the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant was established in 1990, and a recent German study found childhood leukemia clusters near several nuclear power sites in Europe.<br />
According to Dr. Helen Caldicott, a nuclear energy expert, nuclear power plants produce numerous dangerous, carcinogenic elements.  Among them are:  iodine 131, which bio-concentrates in leafy vegetables and milk and can induce thyroid cancer; strontium 90, which bio-concentrates in milk and bone, and can induce breast cancer, bone cancer, and leukemia; cesium 137, which bio-concentrates in meat, and can induce a malignant muscle cancer called a sarcoma; and plutonium 239.  Plutonium 239 is so dangerous that one-millionth of a gram is carcinogenic, and can cause liver cancer, bone cancer, lung cancer, testicular cancer, and birth defects.  Because safe and healthy power sources like solar and wind exist now, we don’t have to rely on risky nuclear power.</p>
<p>6. Not enough sites – Scaling up to 17,000 – or 2,500 or 3,000 &#8212; nuclear plants isn’t possible simply due to the limitation of feasible sites.  Nuclear plants need to be located near a source of water for cooling, and there aren’t enough locations in the world that are safe from droughts, flooding, hurricanes, earthquakes, or other potential disasters that could trigger a nuclear accident.  Over 24 nuclear plants are at risk of needing to be shut down this year because of the drought in the Southeast.  No water, no nuclear power.<br />
There are many communities around the country that simply won’t allow a new nuclear plant to be built – further limiting potential sites.  And there are whole areas of the world that are unsafe because of political instability and the high risk of proliferation.  In short, geography, local politics, political instability and climate change itself, there are not enough sites for a scaled up nuclear power strategy.<br />
Remember that climate change is causing stronger storms and coastal flooding, which in turn reduces the number of feasible sites for nuclear power plants.  Furthermore, due to all of the other strikes against nuclear power, many communities will actively fight against nuclear plants coming into their town.  How could we get enough communities on board to accept the grave risks of nuclear power, if we need to build 17, let alone, 17,000 new plants? </p>
<p>7. Not enough uranium – Even if we could find enough feasible sites for a new generation of nuclear plants, we’re running out of the uranium necessary to power them.  Scientists in both the US and UK have shown that if the current level of nuclear power were expanded to provide all the world&#8217;s electricity, our uranium would be depleted in less than ten years.<br />
As uranium supplies dwindle, nuclear plants will actually begin to use up more energy to mine and mill the uranium than can be recovered through the nuclear reactor process.   What’s more, dwindling supplies will trigger the use of ever lower grades of uranium, which produce ever more climate-change-producing emissions – resulting in a climate-change catch 22.</p>
<p>8. Costs – Some types of energy production, such as solar power, experience decreasing costs to scale.  Like computers and cell phones, when you make more solar panels, costs come down.  Nuclear power, however, will experience increasing costs to scale.  Due to dwindling sites and uranium resources, each successive new nuclear power plant will only see its costs rise, with taxpayers and consumers ultimately paying the price.<br />
What’s worse, nuclear power is centralized power.  A nuclear power plant brings few jobs to its local economy.  In contrast, accelerating solar and energy efficiency solutions creates jobs good-paying, green collar, jobs in every community.<br />
Around the world, nuclear plants are seeing major cost overruns. For example, a new generation nuclear plant in Finland is already experiencing numerous problems and cost overruns of 25 percent of its $4 billion budget.  The US government’s current energy policy providing more than $11 billion in subsidies to the nuclear energy could be much better spent providing safe and clean energy that would give a boost to local communities, like solar and wind power do.  Subsidizing costly nuclear power plants directs that money to large, centralized facilities, built by a few large companies that will take the profits out of the communities they build in.</p>
<p>9. Private sector unwilling to finance – Due to all of the above, the private sector has largely chosen to take a pass on the financial risks of nuclear power, which is what led the industry to seek taxpayer loan guarantees from Congress in the first place.<br />
As the Nuclear Energy Institute recently reported in a brief to the US Department of Energy, “100 percent loan coverage [by taxpayers] is essential … because the capital markets are unwilling, now and for the foreseeable future, to provide the financing necessary” for new nuclear power plants.  Wall Street refuses to invest in nuclear power because the plants are assumed to have a 50 percent default rate.  The only way that Wall Street will put their money behind these plants is if American taxpayers underwrite the risks.  If the private sector has deemed nuclear power too risky, it makes no sense to force taxpayers to bear the burden.<br />
And finally, even if all of the above strikes against nuclear power didn’t exist, nuclear power still can’t be a climate solution because there is …</p>
<p>10. No time – Even if nuclear waste, proliferation, national security, accidents, cancer and other dangers of uranium mining and transport, lack of sites, increasing costs, and a private sector unwilling to insure and finance the projects weren’t enough to put an end to the debate of nuclear power as a solution for climate change, the final nail in nuclear’s coffin is time.  We have the next ten years to mount a global effort against climate change.  It simply isn’t possible to build 17,000 – or 2,500 or 17 for that matter – in ten years.<br />
With so many strikes against nuclear power, it should be off the table as a climate solution, and we need to turn our energies toward the technologies and strategies that can truly make a difference:  solar power, wind power, and energy conservation. </p>
<p>Back to Climate Action: Dirty Energy » </p>
<p>#1<br />
An Estimated 92 Lost Nuclear Bombs Rest at These 15 Sites, these are some of the known missing hotties, imagine how much worse it is.<br />
1.   Russian nuclear submarine Kursk sinks in the Barents Sea.<br />
2.    A B-47 bomber carrying two nuclear weapon cores in their carrying cases disappeared over the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
3.   An American B-36 bomber jettisoned a bomb into the Pacific Ocean.<br />
4.   A C-124 transport aircraft that was having mechanical problems jettisoned two nuclear weapons off the east coast of the United States.<br />
5.   Savannah River, Georgia A nuclear weapon was lost following a mid-air collision.  (Tybee Beach bomb)<br />
6.   Off Whidbey Island, Washington&#8211; A U.S. Navy P-5M aircraft carrying an unarmed nuclear depth charge crashed into Puget Sound<br />
7.   USS Ticonderoga (CVA-14) in the Pacific Ocean an A-4E Skyhawk strike aircraft carrying a nuclear weapon rolled off an elevator on the U.S. aircraft carrier and fell into the sea. (Japanese island chain of Ryukyu)<br />
8.   The USS Scorpion sank 400-500 miles southwest of the Azores. (It was carrying unidentified nuclear weapons.)<br />
9.   Nuclear device from Thor rocket fell into the Pacific Ocean near Johnston Atoll<br />
10. Another Thor rocket lost its payload near Johnston Atoll. (Yes, a second one.)<br />
11. Three nuclear bombs were jettisoned in the Indian Ocean by a U.S. Air Force B-52<br />
12. The K-219, a Soviet Golf II class (Project 629M) diesel-powered ballistic missile submarine armed with three nuclear SS-N-5 missiles, sank in the Pacific, about 750 miles northwest of the Island of Oahu, Hawaii.<br />
13. The K-8, a Soviet November class (Project 627A) nuclear-powered attack submarine, sank in the Atlantic Ocean 300 miles northwest of Spain. (2 nuclear torpedoes, 34 nuclear warheads)<br />
14. The K-219, a Soviet Yankee class (Project 667A) nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine armed with 16 SS-N-6 missiles (two warheads each) and probably also two nuclear torpedoes, sank 600 miles northeast of Bermuda.<br />
15. The K-278 Komsomolets, the Soviet Mike class (Project 685) nuclear-powered attack submarine sank off northern Norway. (2 nuclear torpedoes)</p>
<p>PEACE!<br />
Billy   EarthRising.org </p>
<p>Sources include:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a><br />
Union of Concerned Scientists<br />
Nuclear Power</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/">http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/ </a></p>
<p>U.S. Government Accounting Office<br />
<a href="http://www.gao.gov/">http://www.gao.gov/ </a></p>
<p>Helen Caldicott, MD<br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/articles.htm </a><br />
<a href="http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm">http://www.helencaldicott.com/books.htm#nm </a></p>
<p>Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)</p>
<p>Green America<br />
<a href="http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm">http://www.greenamericatoday.org/programs/climate/dirtyenergy/nuclear.cfm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5<br />
">http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/02/17-5 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/">http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/obamas_nuclear_option_20100216/ </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478">http://www.clevelandleader.com/node/10478 </a></p>
<p>DemocracyNow<br />
<a href="http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose">http://www.democracynow.org/2010/2/24/anti_nuclear_activists_mobilize_to_oppose </a></p>
<p>3 mile island today<br />
<ahref="http://www.google.com/search?q=3+mile+island+today&#038;hl=en&#038;tbs=tl:1&#038;tbo=u&#038;ei=9HqOS5ngMI3esgP0koCxCA&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=timeline_result&#038;ct=title&#038;resnum=16&#038;ved=0CDMQ5wIwDw">3 mile island today</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectcensored.org/static/1979/1979-story24.htm<br />
"> THE TRUTH ABOUT THREE MILE ISLAND &#8230;<br />
      AND OTHER NUCLEAR &#8220;INCIDENTS&#8221;</a></p>
<p>New revelations about Three Mile Island disaster raise doubts over nuclear plant safety<a href="http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A393821<br />
"> The truth behind the meltdown </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mothersalert.org/bertell.html ">3 MILE ISLAND COVER-UP:<br />
DR. ROSALIE BERTELL&#8217;S SIGNED, NOTARIZED STATEMENT<br />
 </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailypaul.com/node/33712"> Ron Paul on Nuclear Power? </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html<br />
">http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter9.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html<br />
">http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm<br />
">http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm </a></p>
<p><a href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/NucEne/cherno2.html   "> Chernobyl </a></p>
<p><a href="http://sites.nationalacademies.org/NRC/index.htm<br />
"> National Research Council </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.grist.org/article/the-final-nail-in-the-pro-nuclear-argument/ "> Grist Magazine</a></p>
<p><a href="http://nukefree.org/"> nukefree.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nonukes.org/"> nonukes.org</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.biofuelswatch.com/obama-contradicts-himself/"> biofuelswatch.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/5611-no-nukes-is-good-nukes.html"> pacific free press</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/letter-to-president-obama/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama: </a><br />
<a href="http://www.beyondnuclear.org/the-nuclear-retreat/<br />
"> Please sign our letter to Nobel Peace Prize winner, President Obama! Dear President. Obama:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/"> Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p>`</p>
<p>Nuclear mishaps, A short list…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/nuclear-mishaps-a-short-list/"> Nuclear mishaps, A short list…</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03082010/hot-links-nuclear-energy-videos-audios-lectures/">Hot Links, Nuclear Energy Videos, Audios, Lectures</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/">Stop Nuclear Insanity, The President Needs Your Help</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' title='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/nuke-waste-30-reactor-energy-drink.jpg' alt='nuke waste 30 Reactor Energy Drink' /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03052010/stop-nuclear-insanity-the-president-needs-your-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EarthRising.org link</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02282010/earthrisingorg-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02282010/earthrisingorg-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[X Internal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02282010/earthrisingorg-link/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.drbillyhealth.com/
EarthRising.org 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">EarthRising.org </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02282010/earthrisingorg-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meat &#038; Dairy Cause Cancer (VIDEO)</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/01202010/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/01202010/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consider This]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[For your health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The VEG Files]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VeganTimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/01202010/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meat &#038; Dairy Cause Cancer (VIDEO)&#8230; 
In the 45 minute talk, Professor Campbell discusses the powerful evidence demonstrating that animal protein is one of the most carcinogenic substances people are regularly exposed to.
CLICK HERE TO VIEW DR. CAMPBELL&#8217;S VIDEO&#8230; and other informative vids too&#8230;
In this fascinating 45-minute talk, Campbell describes his journey from dairy rancher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><MARQUEE BEHAVIOR="SCROLL" DIRECTION="LEFT" SCROLLAMOUNT=5><FONT SIZE= +3 color=FF0000>Meat &#038; Dairy Cause Cancer (VIDEO)&#8230;</FONT></MARQUEE><BR> </em></p>
<p><font size="+1" color="660000">In the 45 minute talk, Professor Campbell discusses the powerful evidence demonstrating that animal protein is one of the most carcinogenic substances people are regularly exposed to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vegsource.com/news/2010/01/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video.html">CLICK HERE TO VIEW DR. CAMPBELL&#8217;S VIDEO&#8230; and other informative vids too&#8230;</a></p>
<p>In this fascinating 45-minute talk, Campbell describes his journey from dairy rancher and animal-protein advocate&#8230;to vegan and disease prevention researcher.</p>
<p>Campbell&#8217;s famous research showed that cancer tumor growth could be turned on &#8212; and turned off &#8212; just by raising or lowering animal protein intake.</p>
<p>You may have to excuse some of the sloppy mainstream adds at the VegSource site&#8230; Good folks. Just paying the bills. Please do check it out.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://www.vegsource.com/news/2010/01/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video.html">CLICK HERE TO VIEW DR. CAMPBELL&#8217;S VIDEO&#8230; and other informative vids too&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/01202010/meat-dairy-cause-cancer-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What About Turkeys?  2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12012009/what-about-turkeys-20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12012009/what-about-turkeys-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Consider This]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The VEG Files]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12012009/what-about-turkeys-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What About Turkeys?  
If you still eat animals, you can help “Free the Turkeys” by simply not eating a turkey’s body this thanksgiving.
If you don’t eat animals you are already saving the lives of (On Average) over 100 defenseless animals every year, and you can spread the word this thanksgiving to help free more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What About Turkeys?  </p>
<p><strong>If you still eat animals</strong>, you can help “Free the Turkeys” by simply not eating a turkey’s body this thanksgiving.</p>
<p><strong>If you don’t eat animals you are already saving the lives of (On Average) over 100 defenseless animals every year</strong>, and you can spread the word this thanksgiving to help free more Turkeys. </FONT></p>
<p>Why would you want to eat the dressing, but spare the bird?</p>
<p>Why would you bother to set a Turkey free?</p>
<p><strong>Consider</strong> that your Thanksgiving Turkey’s natural lifespan is<br />
10 - 12 years</p>
<p>Elapsed time from birth to slaughter of the turkey on your table;<br />
 9 – 15 weeks (That’s WEEKS).</p>
<p>Ratio of “living time” gifted to your turkey by The Creator, to the “living time” allowed by the factory farm industry supported by turkey eating consumers;<br />
<strong>Fifty to One (50:1).</strong></p>
<p>Percentage of “Living Time” stolen from the birds by those who eat them;<br />
 <strong>98% </strong> </p>
<p>Turkeys’ Neurological capacity to feel pain;<br />
<strong>Same as humans, cats and dogs</strong>. </p>
<p>Natural behavioral tendencies; Turkeys are social, playful birds; they enjoy the company of others. They relish having their feathers stroked and like to chirp, cluck, and gobble along to their favorite tunes. Anyone who spends time with them on farm sanctuaries quickly learns that turkeys are as varied in personality as dogs and cats. When not forced to live in filthy factory farms, turkeys spend their days caring for their young, building nests, foraging for food, taking dust-baths, preening themselves, and roosting high in trees.</p>
<p>Number of humans slaughtered by glutinous birds each year in the U.S.;<br />
 Zero</p>
<p>Number of turkeys slaughtered by (For) humans;<br />
 <strong>Over 18 Million in 2007</strong> </p>
<p>Number of Americans who snuffed out Big-Bird’s life because they were starving, and had no other option;<br />
 <strong>Zero!</strong></p>
<p>Turkeys’ right to Life (Living out full life span), Liberty and the pursuit of happiness;<br />
<strong>Obvious, unalienable, undeniable, God-Given</strong>. </p>
<p>Right of humans to deny these rights to Turkeys (The United States’ first proposed national symbol, later replace by the Eagle [who is protected by law]); Illegitimately invented, indefensible, <strong>non-existent in reality.</strong></p>
<p>Why humans (Usually via contract) commit (Participate in);</p>
<p><strong>Rape</strong> – Artificial insemination, and injections of near lethal doses of growth stimulants and other hormones, antibiotics, various other drugs Etc, </p>
<p>`<br />
<strong>Terrorism</strong> – Subjecting non-threatening sentient beings to; Daily conditions so threatening that birds remain in constant fight-or-flight mode, and hormones related to extreme desperation continually saturate the bloodstream, </p>
<p><strong>Torture</strong> – De-beaking, toe-trimming, wing cutting (All without the use of anesthetics), separated from family members, forcing birds to spend their short lives crowded wing-to-wing, beak-to-butt, standing in urine and feces, choking and gasping in an atmosphere deficient in oxygen and replete with poisonous methane and nitrogen compounds and saturated with deadly infectious microbes… struggling in conditions severe enough to kill high percentages before slaughter time, And some undergo the increasingly popular practice (Banned in many counties, but legal in the U.S.) of “Flank Battering”, delivering bruising blows to the live birds body to “Tenderize” the meat, Then transported to the killing facility, tossed and squeezed into trailers driven unprotected through any and all weather conditions, hung live, upside down on body pearling conveyor hooks… and then,,, well it gets worse.  </p>
<p><strong>Murder…</strong> Actually premeditated Pedacide (Slaughter of individuals in childhood), turkeys who would naturally live 12 years are inhumanely killed while still youngsters (At about 3months old) and processed for your feast. </p>
<p>Additionally, handling fowl is the easiest way to contract salmonella and campylobacter, which sickens or kills many people every year.</p>
<p><strong>Environment…</strong> Factory farming animals to produce food is the single industrial practice with the greatest insulting ramifications on the environment and therefore the future… The near future is the era where our children and grandchildren would like to live in a world with safe water and breathable air. Some people think that it’s just not fair to steal the future from our kids for no good reason. With regards to the wasting and polluting of water, the poisoning of the air, the wasting of resources, the release of greenhouse gasses, the clearing of rainforests (The Earth’s Lungs and Medicine Chest) Etc. industrial “Factory Farm” methods, which produce virtually all the birds killed for Thanksgiving feasts are the worst offenders. Concentrated Factory Farms provide the genesis for very threatening infectious diseases. Such operations for producing fowl are the birthplace of “Bird Flu” as one example.   </p>
<p><strong>There is no way</strong> to produce a 35 lb., 3 month old turkey without forced feeding, caged immobilization, and huge pharmaceutical input&#8230; This can not produce a healthy bird, and eating such &#8220;Abuse&#8221; certainly does not produce healthy people&#8230;<br />
By the way &#8220;Organic&#8221; Turkeys are still the product of disease producing abuse, commercial &#8220;Free Range&#8221; is only a deceiving term, and while &#8220;Organic Meat&#8221; may deliver fewer poisons it&#8217;s still murder.</p>
<p><strong>Eating commercially grown animals is a practice which (Because it is so wasteful and polluting) simply is not sustainable</strong> on a planet with limited resources and an ecosystem in delicate balance, and such behavior does indeed directly take food away from other hungry people and reduce our ability to provide food and a clean world for those who are now the children we so love.</p>
<p><strong>More and more people just can no longer reconcile the hypocrisy</strong> that allows for “Giving Thanks for the Plenty”, when that “Plenty” has taken life from another, fostered the acceptance of killing (By the Billions Every Year) and so damaged our one and only Home Planet as to threaten the well-being of everyone in future times. </p>
<p><strong>It seems to many</strong>, who have considered the facts, that there will be no way to excuse such selfish behavior when the grandchildren ask “Why did you so carelessly contribute to the ruination of our only life-giving planet, and what was it like to live in a time when people participated in such horrific and careless consumerism which was responsible for torture and murder of those in their care?”  </p>
<p>This is the unholy legacy that turkey eating people bring into their bodies and share with family and friends…</p>
<p><strong>We sincerely wish that everyone has a happy healthy Thanksgiving.</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;Thanksgiving is an appropriate time to exercise compassion and not interrupt the peace and happiness of others.</p>
<p>Happy Thanks-Giving,       Right to Life for All Society<br />
Sources:<br />
FarmSanctuary.org, EarthSave.org, VeganTimes.org, VeganOutreach.org, VegSource.com, VeganWorld.org</p>
<p>_________________________________________________</p>
<p>Related links:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12222008/how-many-land-animals-have-been-killed-for-the-meat-dairy-and-egg-industries-since-you-opened-this-webpage/"> See how many land animals have been killed for the meat, dairy, and egg industries since you opened this web page…</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02272008/backwards-burger-video/">Backwards Burger Video</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-original-the-meatrix/">The Original, The Meatrix </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-meatrix-25/">The Meatrix 2.5</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02182008/usda-recalls-over-100-million-pounds-of-beef-products/">USDA Recalls over 100 Million Pounds of Beef Products </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05032007/most-chicken-harbors-harmful-bacteria/">Most Chicken Harbors Harmful Bacteria </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05022008/v-think-essaysthoughts-ideas-inspiration/">V Think— Essays,Thoughts, Ideas, Inspiration…</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/09182007/sustainable-living-and-%e2%80%9crealities%e2%80%9d/">Sustainable living and “Realities” </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/09192007/more-realities%e2%80%a6-health-health-care-and-the-business-of-illness/">More Realities… Health, Health Care and the Business of Illness </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04152007/starve-or-feed-easy-choice-simple-solution/">Starve or Feed,.. Easy choice,.. Simple Solution </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06062008/the-vegan-store-2/">The VEGAN Store </a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/web-vgn-oval-1-small.jpg' title='VGN'><img src='http://www.drbillyhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/web-vgn-oval-1-small.thumbnail.jpg' alt='VGN' /></a></p>
<p><strong>The VEGAN Store </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/category/vegan-store/">  Click here for<br />
The VEGAN Store<br />
departments   </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/mad-cowboy-the-documentary/">Mad Cowboy: The Documentary</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/the-veg-files/">The VEG Files </a></p>
<p> <a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to Dr Billy Health HOME PAGE</a></p>
<p>Billy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05062008/your-worst-day-is-a-picnic/">Your worst day is a picnic… </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12012009/what-about-turkeys-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Humanized Organization of Particles</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/07192009/humanized-organization-of-particles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/07192009/humanized-organization-of-particles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/07192009/humanized-organization-of-particles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be Amazed:
Humanized Organization of Particles&#8230;
The modern human body contains up to 100 trillion cells, and each cell contains approximately a trillion atoms.
The human body contains Ten Octillion atoms, that’s 10-to-the28th atoms.
This is what the number looks like:
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (1 followed by 28 zeros).
Utilizing radioactive isotope measurements, science has established that 90 percent of our atoms are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be Amazed:</p>
<p><font size="+4" color="000099"><strong><em>Humanized Organization of Particles&#8230;</em></font></p>
<p><font size="+1" color="000099">The modern human body contains up to 100 trillion cells, and each cell contains approximately a trillion atoms.</p>
<p>The human body contains Ten Octillion atoms, that’s 10-to-the28th atoms.<br />
This is what the number looks like:</p>
<p>10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (1 followed by 28 zeros).</p>
<p>Utilizing radioactive isotope measurements, science has established that 90 percent of our atoms are replaced annually. </p>
<p>In fewer than 2,000 days, it’s all brand new (To me and you) </p>
<p>…Every five years, 100 percent of our atoms are exchanged for new ones. </p>
<p>So, each hour, about a ‘septillion’ of your atoms are replaced. </p>
<p>There is a whole lot of <strong>‘Intelligent Renewal’ </strong>going on that we never have to think about and for the most part we don’t even feel.</p>
<p>That’s just really cool!</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/07192009/humanized-organization-of-particles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeding the Homeland with Mutants&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06282009/seeding-the-homeland-with-mutants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06282009/seeding-the-homeland-with-mutants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Alerts!]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06282009/seeding-the-homeland-with-mutants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeding the Homeland with Mutants 
Most world governments will have nothing to do with GMO food crops.
Most U.S. citizens don’t want to eat the stuff.
Yet, without the people’s consent or due process, poison transgenic plants have been scattered over ‘public’ lands:
ONE-THIRD OF U.S. WILDLIFE REFUGES USE GM CROPS IN SOUTHEAST
Genetically Modified Seeds Okayed by Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Seeding the Homeland with Mutants </p>
<p>Most world governments will have nothing to do with GMO food crops.<br />
Most U.S. citizens don’t want to eat the stuff.<br />
Yet, without the people’s consent or due process, poison transgenic plants have been scattered over ‘public’ lands:<br />
ONE-THIRD OF U.S. WILDLIFE REFUGES USE GM CROPS IN SOUTHEAST<br />
Genetically Modified Seeds Okayed by Obama Fish &#038; Wildlife Service Director Pick Hamilton</strong></p>
<p>Washington, DC - One-third of National Wildlife Refuges in<br />
the Southeast U.S. are growing genetically modified crops with approval<br />
from the official tapped by the Obama White House to head the U.S. Fish<br />
&#038; Wildlife Service, according to agency records obtained today by<br />
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Planting GM<br />
crops on a wildlife refuge is illegal without full prior environmental<br />
and public review under a federal court ruling won by PEER and allied<br />
groups last year, but none of the Southeastern refuges have undertaken<br />
the required reviews.</p>
<p>[…] In the Southeast Region, headed by Sam Hamilton, named by the<br />
Obama administration as its intended nominee to lead the entire FWS,<br />
records show: </p>
<p><strong>One in three (41 of 128 total refuges) are growing GM crops;<br />
No refuge has been denied permission for GM crops; and<br />
The basis for Hamilton&#8217;s Regional Office approval typically cites farmers&#8217; profitability or their preference for GM crops.</strong></p>
<p>From:<br />
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility News Release (www.peer.org)<br />
June 25, 2009, Carol Goldberg </p>
<p><a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/National-Wild-Refuges-in-t-by-foodchoices-090626-993.html">Rest of story</a></p>
<p>`<br />
<strong>Meanwhile: </p>
<p>Federal Judge Says No to Modified Crops on US Refuge Land</strong><br />
by Bill Lambrecht</p>
<p><strong>WASHINGTON - In a court case with potential impact in Missouri and across the country</strong>, a federal judge in Delaware ruled today that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife should not have permitted farming with genetically modified crops on a national wildlife refuge.<br />
A federal judge in Delaware ruled today that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife should not have permitted farming with genetically modified crops on a national wildlife refuge.(AFP/Illustration/Jean-Pierre Muller)<br />
U.S. District Judge Gregory Sleet wrote that the Fish and Wildlife agency erred by failing to conduct environmental studies to determine whether farming with genetically modified crops at the Prime Hook National Wildlife Refuge in Delaware was compatible with conservation and habitat preservation.<br />
  From: commondreams.org</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/03/25-7">MORE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06282009/seeding-the-homeland-with-mutants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MILK MATH</title>
		<link>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06072009/milk-math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06072009/milk-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 20:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Billy Saunders</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The VEG Files]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[VeganTimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06072009/milk-math/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MILK MATH&#8230;
Some revealing milk related numbers 
THE &#8216;WHOLESOME&#8217; PROTEIN MYTH:
 87% of milk is water. That makes for some VERY expensive water. Broken down into its basic groups&#8230; WHOLE MILK is: WATER (87%), FAT(3.7%), CARBOHYDRATE / LACTOSE (4.9%), FIBER (0%), CASEIN AND OTHER PROTEIN (3.5) (note: that is 3.7% &#8220;milkfat&#8221; which includes the 87% water.) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+4" color="000099"><strong><em>MILK MATH&#8230;</em></font></p>
<p><font size="+1" color="000099">Some revealing milk related numbers </p>
<p>THE &#8216;WHOLESOME&#8217; PROTEIN MYTH:</strong><br />
 87% of milk is water. That makes for some VERY expensive water. Broken down into its basic groups&#8230; WHOLE MILK is: WATER (87%), FAT(3.7%), CARBOHYDRATE / LACTOSE (4.9%), FIBER (0%), CASEIN AND OTHER PROTEIN (3.5) (note: that is 3.7% &#8220;milkfat&#8221; which includes the 87% water.) </p>
<p><strong>80% of the protein in milk is casein. Casein is a powerful binder</strong>&#8230; a polymer used to make plastics. It is an adhesive that is better used to affix labels to mayonnaise jars then eat or drink. It is sneaked into thousands of processed foods as a binder&#8230; It appears on the label as &#8220;Whatever&#8221; caseinate. <strong>Casein is a powerful allergen&#8230; it activates histamine which creates lots of mucus. </strong></p>
<p>It’s not just about gobs of mucus, indeed, <strong>cows&#8217; milk protein may be the single most significant chemical carcinogen to which humans are exposed</strong>, to say nothing of its other negative effects on health.</p>
<p>Sound science clearly demonstrates that: animal protein, when consumed in excess of protein requirements,<strong> is one of the most toxic nutrients of all. Risk for disease goes up dramatically when even a little animal protein is added to the diet.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dr. T. Colin Campbell states:  “casein as an animal protein promotes cancer, in spades. [ ] casein is the most relevant chemical carcinogen ever discovered”.</strong></p>
<p>T. Colin Campbell, is Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University</p>
<p>Many studies demonstrate that diets high in protein (Especially Animal Protein) lower bone density and increase rick of fracture.</p>
<p><strong>CALCIUM, MILK AND BONE DENSITY:<br />
Fact: Around the world, the higher the dairy intake, the higher  the osteoporosis rates.</strong>  Osteoporosis is not a calcium deficiency disease! Bone is composed of at least a dozen minerals, going ape over calcium actually increases the risk and severity of osteoporosis.<br />
Think you’re absorbing usable calcium from cow’s milk? Nutritionists consider the optimum ratio (For calcium absorption) of Calcium to Magnesium to be 1:2. <strong>The ratio in milk at 10:1is 20 times to the negative,</strong> and would seem to be one of the reasons that; the more milk people drink /eat, the ‘Swiss- cheesy-er’ their bones become. So, as a bone-density promoting agent, cows’ milk fails profoundly when used by humans. Unabsorbed (Cellular- ly) calcium does cause great harm however, accumulating as micro-gravel in joints and becoming part of the cross-linkage ‘plaster’ which is so good at clogging arteries.   </p>
<p><strong>BACTERIA:<br />
Cow&#8217;s milk is allowed to have feces in it </strong>and always does. This is one of the sources of bacteria that milk drinkers drink. Milk is typically pasteurized for only 15 seconds at 162 degrees Fahrenheit. To sanitize water we are told to boil it (190-212 degrees F) for 20 minutes. Curious.<br />
Keep in mind that at room temperature the number of bacteria in milk DOUBLE around every 20 minutes. As you know, milk turns rotten (more rotten) very quickly. While pasteurization lowers the bacterial count (Good bugs and bad bugs) it totally wipes out all the enzymes which would help to digest the milky mess.</p>
<p><strong>PUS:<br />
ONE cubic centimeter (cc) of commercial cow&#8217;s milk is allowed to have up to 750,000 somatic cells (&#8221;PUS&#8221; cells) and 20,000 live bacteria before it is kept off the market.</strong><br />
That amounts to a whopping 20 million live (And rapidly replicating) squiggly bacteria and up to 750 MILLION pus cells per liter / quart.</p>
<p>Or:<br />
1 cup = 236.5882cc 177,441,150 pus cells and 4,731,600 bacteria.</p>
<p>Or:<br />
24 oz (3 glasses) (the &#8220;recommended&#8221; daily intake) = 532,323,450 pus cells and 14,220,000 bacteria The EU and the Canadians allow for a ‘tangy’  400,000,000 pus cells per liter.</p>
<p>Based on allowable (And common) counts of white blood cells and bacteria, that famous movie, recording or sports star in the commercials and magazine adds is wearing a <strong>white mustache containing 300,000 white blood cells and 25,000 bacteria.</strong></p>
<p><strong>CHOLESTEROL:</strong><br />
The cholesterol content of those three glasses of milk is equal to what one would get from 53 slices of bacon. <strong>53 SLICES OF BACON!</strong></p>
<p>The milk of each of the over 4,700 mammals on earth is formulated specifically for each species… In the milk that humans usually drink there are special lactoferrins and immunoglobulins (cow specific immunizing compounds) that in humans serve as allergens.</p>
<p><strong>LACTOSE:</strong><br />
MOST of the world&#8217;s human population CANNOT tolerate the lactose in cow&#8217;s milk.<br />
This includes up to 95% of the black population, around 55% of Hispanics, and most of the Anglos that I know.</p>
<p><strong>LEUKEMIA:</strong><br />
 According to the trade publication, &#8216;Hoards Dairyman&#8217; (Volume 147, number 4)&#8230; 89% of America&#8217;s dairy herds have the leukemia virus.</p>
<p><strong>MAD COW DISEASE:</strong><br />
There are also prions (pronounced prahy-on) in the milk and meat. This is a microscopic proteinaceous particle, likened to viruses and viroids and linked to Mad Cow Disease&#8230; with an &#8220;incubation&#8221; period of from 5 to 30 years. The end result (In homogenized milk) is MAD COW DISEASE! HOMOGENIZATION. Large fat molecules cannot get through the intestinal wall into the bloodstream&#8230;  But because homogenization breaks up those large molecules into small ones that DO get into the bloodstream, this becomes an expressway for any fat-borne infectious agents and toxins (lead, dioxin&#8217;s, etc.) into your (otherwise) most protected organs.</p>
<p><strong>A TRILLION POUNDS OF UNTREATED WASTE:</strong><br />
There are around 10 million dairy cows in the United States. Each dairy cow ingests 40- 50 pounds of feed and around 280 pounds or 33 gallons of water per day. Allowing for the best dairy production of 55 pounds of milk per day (over ten times what Mother Nature designed the cow to produce) we can see that the balance becomes &#8220;slurry&#8221;, or Poop and Pee Tea.<br />
That means around 275 pounds of urine and feces per day&#8230; per cow, for a daily total of 2.75 BILLION pounds of ‘biologically active’ pollution. Per year&#8230; that amounts to ONE TRILLION pounds of UNTREATED pollution entering our streams, rivers, lakes&#8230; and drinking water systems… Entering us, even those who don’t drink milk.</p>
<p><strong>10,000,000 dairy cows make a big mess:</p>
<p>Each cow’s intake:<br />
   50 lb. feed<br />
+280 lb. water<br />
____________________</p>
<p>  330 lb. input<br />
-   55 lb. milk<br />
____________________</p>
<p>275 lb. output (Poop n’ Pee Tea) per cow, per day<br />
X 10,000,000 dairy cows in U.S.<br />
____________________</p>
<p>2,750,000,000 lb. output (Poop n’ Pee Tea) per day<br />
X 365<br />
____________________<br />
1,003,750,000,000 (Over ONE TRILLION POUNDS OF ‘SICK COW POOP N’ PEE TEA.) That’s just the U.S.’s contribution. </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12222008/how-many-land-animals-have-been-killed-for-the-meat-dairy-and-egg-industries-since-you-opened-this-webpage/"> Dare to look at &#8216;Active Numbers&#8217;…</a></p>
<p>Congress recently announced that they will be giving an additional $5 billion in subsidies to dairy farmers. Thanks guys.</p>
<p>These stats are a few years old. We can assume (as history shows) that the numbers get worse every year:<br />
The Dairy Industry is really big business, with sales of over $11 billion for milk and $16 billion for cheese annually in the USA alone.<br />
Dairy Management Inc., whose purpose is to build demand for dairy products on behalf of America&#8217;s 80,000-plus dairy producers released the Dairy Check-off 2003 Unified Marketing Plan (UMP) with a budget of $165.7 million. … To protect and enhance consumer confidence in dairy products and the dairy industry.<br />
 A significant portion of the money from the 2003 Unified Marketing Plan is specifically targeted to children ages 6 to 12 and their mothers. The goal is &#8220;to guide school-age children to become life-long consumers of dairy products, 2003 activities targeted students, parents, educators and school foodservice professionals.&#8221; (Similar words and intentions have been attributed to the tobacco industry.) All this marketing is working, too: annual fluid milk consumption among kids 6 to 12 increased to 28 gallons per capita, the highest level in 10 years. Children under 18 drink /eat 46% of the milk consumed in the USA. This includes all dairy products that are made from milk: non-fat milk, low-fat milk, buttermilk, cheeses, cottage cheese, yogurt, ice cream, whey, kefir, and butter. All of them share a similar nutritional profile (plus or minus the fat, protein, and sugar), and as a result, all of them contribute to a wide range of health problems and supply various dangerous agents: E. coli, AIDS and Leukemia Viruses… Lots of drugs.</p>
<p><strong>Dairy products were the foods most often recalled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)</strong> from the period October 1, 1993 through September 30, 1998 because of contamination with infectious agents, mostly bacteria. They are commonly tainted with disease-causing bacteria, such as salmonella, staphylococci, listeria, deadly E. coli O1573 and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis  (thought to be one of the agents causing Crohn&#8217;s disease; a form of life-threatening chronic colitis), as well as viruses known to cause lymphoma and leukemia-like diseases, and immune deficiency in cattle.</p>
<p><strong>AIDS and Leukemia Viruses:</strong><br />
Dairy cattle are infected with bovine immunodeficiency viruses (BIV) and bovine leukemia viruses (BLV), worldwide. (Bovine immunodeficiency viruses can also be properly referred to as bovine AIDS viruses.)</p>
<p><strong>In the United States, results show an average 40% of beef herds and 64% of dairy herds are infected with BIV.</strong> In Canada the infection rate is 70% and in Argentina the rate is 84% for BLV. Herds infected with the BIV are usually infected with the leukemia virus (BLV) as well.<br />
<strong>Both viruses can cross species lines thus infecting other animals, like sheep, goats, and chimpanzees and humans, who can then the develop disease.</strong> Nationwide and worldwide, leukemia is more common in the higher dairy consuming populations. An increased incidence of leukemia has been found among dairy farmers in multiple studies. BIV infection has been reported in at least one person. The bovine leukemia virus has been classified in the same group as the Human T-cell Leukemia/Lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1), which is known to cause leukemia and lymphomas in humans (Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma). BIV is structurally and genetically closely related to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type-1 (the virus causing human AIDS). Pasteurization kills many types of microorganisms, but it is by no means foolproof.</p>
<p><strong>KOSHER:</strong><br />
Is cow&#8217;s milk and dairy &#8220;Kosher&#8221;? Consider this: &#8220;D-3 always is derived from an animal”. The sunlight reaction that converts 7dehydrocholesterol to vitamin D-3 is a bio-chemical reaction that occurs in the skin within specific cells “The provitamin known as 7-dehydrocholesterol is extracted and isolated from the skins of mammals and purified.” (Marian Herbert of the Vitamin D Workshop U of C) Vitamin D-3 can come from four different sources: Pig skin, sheep skin, raw fish liver, and pig brains. Most of the time, Vitamin D3 is extracted from pig skin and sold to dairy processors. Short answer to &#8220;is milk kosher&#8221; – NO.</p>
<p><strong>OTHER &#8216;STUFF&#8217;:</strong><br />
Fat and cholesterol. Lots of it. Per the dairy influenced USDA &#8220;food pyramid&#8221;, all milk, dairy and meats should represent no more than 8% of the diet. Statistically, by volume of sales in a nation of 300 million Americans, it works out to almost 40% of the diet just for MILK AND DAIRY. That’s without the meat.</p>
<p><strong>LACTALBUMIN: </strong><br />
The protein lactalbumin has been identified as a key factor in diabetes (and a very good reason for NOT giving cow’s milk to infants).</p>
<p><strong>CROHN&#8217;S DISEASE:</strong><br />
Mycobacterium paratuberculosis causes a bovine disease called &#8220;Johne&#8217;s.&#8221; Cows diagnosed with Johne&#8217;s Disease have diarrhea, and heavy fecal shedding of bacteria. This bacterium becomes cultured in milk, and is NOT destroyed by pasteurization. Sometimes the milk-borne bacteria will begin to grow in the human host, and the results are irritable bowel syndrome and Crohn&#8217;s Disease.</p>
<p><strong>Otitis Media (infection of the middle ear):</strong><br />
More than ten million children a year suffer from ear infections in the United States.<br />
The eustachian tube becomes clogged with mucus and the pressure in the ear rises and the ear becomes infected.<br />
Otitis Media (infection of the middle ear) is the most frequent diagnosis recorded for children who visit physicians for illness.  Two out of three children under the age of 3 experience this painful, often damaging malady… Most children in the U.S. are fed cow’s milk. An inner ear infection is the most common cause of hearing loss in children. Far too many kids end up with plastic ear tubes. The surgical procedure for placing tubes in the ears has become one of the most commonly performed operations of any kind. In the 90s a million or more children each year underwent surgery to have “ventilation” tubes inserted in one or both ears.</p>
<p>Michael Klaper, M.D., explains how the <strong>proteins found in Cow’s milk create a health hazard.</strong> He writes, &#8220;A common reaction to such an assault by a foreign [bovine] protein in our immune systems is an outpouring of mucus from the nasal and throat membranes. The resulting mucus flow can create chronic runny nose, persistent sore throats, hoarseness, bronchitis, and the recurrent ear infections that plague so many children.&#8221;<br />
A Georgetown University study showed that up to 86 percent of ear infections improved when children stopped drinking cow’s milk and other allergens.</p>
<p><strong>CUMULATIVE EFFECTS:</strong><br />
How does all this impact humans who consume cow&#8217;s milk and dairy?</p>
<p><strong>Obesity (more than 34 percent of Americans are obese 33 percent are overweight, and about 6 percent are &#8220;extremely&#8221; obese.</strong> And all the numbers are rising), heart disease, cancer, allergies, digestive problems, diabetes, asthma, desensitization to antibiotics, behavioral problems, and the constant ingestion of dioxin&#8217;s, herbicides, pesticides (and all other poisons that a cow eats or is exposed to), that winds up getting stored in HUMAN fat&#8230; is not healthy by any measure. One reason people get fat (Fatter) is because the body needs more and more storage media to pack-away the never ending input of funky stuff taken in through poor diet. Fat is a high-capacity storage media.</p>
<p>So much for cow&#8217;s milk being &#8220;nature’s perfect food&#8221; for humans! Mother Nature knows better and someone who honestly thinks about <em>just what milk is</em>, must get it as well.<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05152009/milk-and-the-many-ill-conditions-it-causes/"> See: Milk, and the many ill conditions it causes</a></p>
<p><strong>COMMON QUESTIONS:</strong><br />
Where was this massive &#8220;milk is a must&#8221; before refrigeration, pasteurization and mass transportation? Back when cows gave only 1-4 pounds a day it was quickly made into BUTTER and cheese! Now that cows have been tweaked and shot-up with Posilac to produce up to 55 or more pounds of milk per day&#8230; almost all year long&#8230; it is suddenly (after many thousands of years) a daily &#8220;staple&#8221; for those of us who eat according to diabolical advertising and corporate programming… And still, most of the world’s people don’t use the stuff, you know, people who never deal with osteoporosis, people who are not inundated with ‘dairy counsel’ advertising and where the schools’ nutrition-educational material is not provided by meat and dairy interests.   </p>
<p><strong>MORE POLLUTION:</strong><br />
Cows are hot-blooded mammals. Like all other mammals they produce methane gas. The English New Scientist (page 5 -31.8.96) mentions that cattle produce around 48 kilograms (110 pounds) of methane each per year and that much more bubbles out of the animals&#8217; manure. Dairy cows eat more because they produce milk. Ten million dairy cows, times a minimum of 100 pounds of methane gas per year&#8230; that amounts to about a billion pounds of methane gas released into the atmosphere each year, just in the U.S. With around 100 million beef cattle&#8230; pigs, sheep, and other &#8220;factory farmed&#8221; animals it should not be difficult to fathom the extent of this problem. This means that &#8220;Beef / MILK is a greenhouse-intensive food&#8221; and a major cause of climate change  (with dairy a significant part of that problem). </p>
<p><strong>ANOTHER MAJOR POINT IS: </strong><br />
Milk itself is a very potent pollutant: it is about 400 times more polluting than untreated sewage. To put it another way, 1,000 gallons of milk has the same polluting potential as the untreated sewage from a town of 7,000 people.&#8221; Morlais Owen. Chief Scientist for Welsh Water. North Wales Weekly News. 24.3.88.</p>
<p><strong>SOME QUESTIONS ANSWERED:</strong><br />
Q: What is WHEY?<br />
A: Whey results when the FAT and CASEIN are removed from milk. In making cheese, the curds become the cheese. Whey&#8217;s main components are bovine serum albumin and lactalbumin. There are other hormones contained in whey.</p>
<p>Q: What happens to the: 59 hormones, scores of allergens herbicides, pesticides, dioxins up to 52 antibiotics when made into cheese?<br />
A: Everything gets concentrated.<br />
When made into butter?<br />
A: The allergens get lost: but the dioxin and pesticides and antibiotics remain in the fat.<br />
In the digestive system?<br />
A: Steroid hormones survive, as do dioxin and antibiotics.<br />
In homogenized milk, protein hormones survive&#8230; depending upon the gastric pH, some protein hormones in cheese survive, but not all&#8230; But at least eleven steroid hormones survive. </p>
<p><strong>AND WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? </strong><br />
Eventually, everything is broken down, but not before the chemical messengers (hormones) &#8220;deliver their message.&#8221; Each of those hormones and proteins acts differently and has different rates of degradation. BOTTOM LINE&#8230; they all survive to a certain degree&#8230; and the effects are cumulative.</p>
<p><strong>OTHER HEATH-TRASHING SUBSTANCES IN COW&#8217;S MILK:</strong><br />
Whey: Blood proteins. Bovine serum lactalbumin has been identified as a trigger for diabetes and other autoimmune diseases. Lactose: Two sugars. Glucose and galactose. Galactose has been identified as a trigger for glaucoma. …</p>
<p><strong>T. Time:</strong><br />
According to a report released by the &#8216;National Association<br />
for Continence&#8217;, which studies bathroom behavior, the average<br />
American spends 55 minutes per day sitting on the toilet. This is the ‘average’ not the worst. </p>
<p>Eschewing meat and dairy, which provide ZERO fiber, helps produce an efficient elimination system allowing some people to spend only about three minutes per day tending to the same chore. They’ve got about six hours more free time each week, and three hundred free hours per year. </p>
<p><strong>Eighty percent of milk protein is casein, the major mucous producer.</strong><br />
Casein from cow&#8217;s milk is a foreign protein. When you eat this antigen, your body&#8217;s immune system manufactures an antibody. The antibody is histamine. As a result of histamine production, you produce mucus, and lots of it. </p>
<p><strong>Sprinkle Parmesan cheese on your pasta and ten hours later</strong>, you&#8217;ll have produced enough mucous to fill the empty quart container of Ben &#038; Jerry&#8217;s <strong>Salmonella Vanilla</strong>. Most Americans continuously eat one form or another of dairy products. The average American eats the equivalent of 30 ounces per day from this food group (Many children, and ladies trying to protect their skeletal density, consume much more). For many of them, ‘unproductive’<br />
bowel movements are a way of life, and they don’t know what it is like to be regular. </p>
<p><strong>A diet style which supports efficient bathroom experiences profits a person with 15 - 20,000 extra productive hours over the average American’s lifetime.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cases of type 1 diabetes in children </strong>under five years is predicted to double in the next decade, yes double in 10 short years. The main culprit is likely diet (Not responsibility-relieving genetics), and ‘wholesome’ milk is likely the critical dietary component… Type 2 diabetes, now an exponentially growing, raging epidemic is always dietarilly self induced, and dairy junk is part of that problem as well… All totally preventable. Stop drinking someone else’s milk, eating someone else’s body and eating junk. Not too hard to figure out.<br />
`<br />
According to: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/8624.php<br />
Just a handful of foods are to blame for 90% of allergic reactions to food.<br />
From the short list of the worst offenders:<br />
<strong>Milk is number ONE</strong><br />
Eggs is number two</font></p>
<p><font size="+2" color="CC0000 "><strong>THE VEAL CONNECTION: </strong></font><br />
<font size="+1" color="000099">Some 750,000 calves are raised and killed for veal in the United States (American Veal Association, 2000) each year. Those baby boys are bi-products of the milk that humans drink. Most veal calves are unwanted males from ‘the business of dairy’. </p>
<p>Dairy cows must give birth to continue producing milk, but male dairy calves are of little or no value to the dairy operation.<br />
Two types of veal are recognized by the USDA: bob veal, produced from calves slaughtered at up to <strong>three weeks</strong> of age, and special-fed veal, from calves slaughtered around <strong>16-weeks</strong>. These little guys would live <strong>25 years</strong> if left to nature. Those who live till 16 weeks weigh up to 450 pounds but are still held captive and totally immobile in their life-long cage measuring about two feet by five and a half feet. I would like to see an average weight human spend one day in such ‘accommodations’, and it would seem only empathetically fitting that a milk drinking / veal eating person would spend some time ‘getting-a-feel’ for where his milkshake and cutlet come from.     </p>
<p><strong>Ouch!</strong><br />
Because so little attention is given to the welfare of the cows, 100% of them are [miss] treated inhumanely and an estimated 200,000 per year become so sick they’re unable to walk or even stand. Their meat must still be harvested. Profit, Profit, Profit. Some is eaten by humans, some is fed back to the cows and beef steers and some becomes chicken feed… Some is cooked, compressed and ends up in BABY FOOD. Baby food for human babies. How nice, and let’s wash that down with a bottle of nice room temperature milk, what do you say junior.  </p>
<p><strong>And…</p>
<p>What the ‘Milk Pushers’ were up to fifty years ago:</strong><br />
The front cover of the June 25, 1959 issue of Hoard&#8217;s has an imprinted map of the United States announcing &#8220;June is Dairy Month.&#8221;<br />
This milk promotion program has been going on for a long time! </p>
<p>While America was being conned by milk ads, what truths were dairy insiders reading? </p>
<p>Opening the front cover of the June 25, 1959 issue,<br />
 the reader found a full page ad for: </p>
<p>&#8220;The NEW Teramycin for mastitis&#8221; treatment. </p>
<p>The ad copy reveals that the NEW Pfizer drug controls ten or more kinds of mastitis germs causing infections.<br />
Infections? Germs?<br />
If only Americans knew what was going on with those udders back in 1959. Five decades later, most milk consumers are still in the dark. In 2009, the cost of mastitis control per cow now exceeds $200 per year.<br />
That&#8217;s over $2 billion dollars of drugs in their bodies and yours (If you partake.)</p>
<p>The inside rear cover of the 1959 issue of Hoard&#8217;s contains a full page ad for<br />
what&#8217;s marketed as a &#8220;hidden drug treatment,&#8221; American Cyanamid&#8217;s Aureomycin, an antibiotic that was once placed in animal feed.<br />
The ad copy lets dairymen know: </p>
<p>&#8220;Grass alone [their natural diet] can&#8217;t give your cows all the food values they need for sustained high production. When you&#8217;re feeding cows&#8230;<br />
an effective antibiotic in the ration becomes more urgent.&#8221; </p>
<p>Cows [and the people who eat and drink them] have been fed antibiotics for generations, and few people outside of the industry knew.<br />
Little boys and girls were fed these same antibiotics, day after day. Ever wonder why we had such a runaway Candida (Infective yeast / fungus) epidemic in the eighties, and why the world is now plagued with antibiotic-resistant super-bugs?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an appropriate June quote by which dairy farmers can celebrate their special month. The following appeared ten years ago in the June, 1999 issue of a peer-reviewed scientific journal, Food Protein (Volume 62): </p>
<p>&#8220;The administration of sub therapeutic doses of antibiotics to livestock introduces selective pressures that may lead to the emergence and dissemination of resistant bacteria. The present findings clearly demonstrate that antibiotic-resistant bacteria in beef and milk pose a serious problem.&#8221; </p>
<p>Today, little boys and girls cannot be treated effectively with allopathic medicine for infections because antibiotics no longer work. Doctors are blamed for over-prescribing medicines. This is but part of the problem&#8230; All the while, new strains of germs grew within cows and developed immunities to antibiotics. If one eats antibiotics every day, and drinks antibiotic-laced milk containing germs with immunities, she / he will gain nothing by taking those same antibiotics when they are needed to treat human infection. Duh!</p>
<p>Got antibiotics? </p>
<p>Happy National Dairy Month.</p>
<p>Love, Billy </font></p>
<p>______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p>V LINKS:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04292008/vegantimes/ ">Request a vegetarian starter kit today…</a> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.goveg.com/order.asp ">Request a vegetarian starter kit today…</a></p>
<p>Potluck, or Guess Who Else is Coming to Dinner<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04252009/potluck-or-guess-who-else-is-coming-to-dinner/"> Potluck, or Guess Who Else is Coming to Dinner</a></p>
<p>Great Compassion, Pets<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03112009/great-compassion-pets/"> Great Compassion, Pets</a></p>
<p>Interview with the NotMilk Man<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02282009/interview-with-the-notmilk-man/"> Interview with the NotMilk Man</a></p>
<p>How many land animals have been killed for the meat, dairy, and egg industries since you opened this webpage…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12222008/how-many-land-animals-have-been-killed-for-the-meat-dairy-and-egg-industries-since-you-opened-this-webpage/"> How many land animals have been killed for the meat, dairy, and egg industries since you opened this webpage…</a></p>
<p>Vegan Web Directory from SuperVegan<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/12122008/vegan-web-directory-from-supervegan/"> Vegan Web Directory from SuperVegan</a></p>
<p>Free Turkeys For a Happy Healthy Thanksgiving<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/11062008/free-turkeys-for-a-happy-healthy-thanksgiving/"> Free Turkeys For a Happy Healthy Thanksgiving</a></p>
<p>Your worst day is a picnic<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/09232008/your-worst-day-is-a-picnic/"> Your worst day is a picnic</a></p>
<p>Koreans Say U.S. MAD COW is Bull<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06112008/80000-protest-us-beef-imports-in-south-korea/"> Koreans Say U.S. MAD COW is Bull</a></p>
<p>Turkeys<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05062008/turkeys/"> Turkeys</a></p>
<p>No Meal is an Island<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05042008/no-meal-is-an-island-2/"> No Meal is an Island</a></p>
<p>Animal Communicator<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05022008/animal-communicator/"> Animal Communicator</a></p>
<p>Milk, and the many ill conditions it causes<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05152009/milk-and-the-many-ill-conditions-it-causes/"> Milk, and the many ill conditions it causes</a></p>
<p>Doreen the Downer<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/doreen-the-downer/"> Doreen the Downer</a></p>
<p>Animal Rights Conference 2007 - Howard Lyman<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/animal-rights-conference-2007-howard-lyman/"> Animal Rights Conference 2007 - Howard Lyman</a></p>
<p>Mad Cow Story<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/mad-cow-story/"> Mad Cow Story</a></p>
<p>Mad Cowboy: The Documentary<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/mad-cowboy-the-documentary/"> Mad Cowboy: The Documentary</a></p>
<p>Making Vegan Pizza<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/03012008/making-vegan-pizza/"> Making Vegan Pizza</a></p>
<p>Backwards Burger Video<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02272008/backwards-burger-video/"> Backwards Burger Video</a></p>
<p>Zack Price, Why Vegetarian…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/zack-price-why-vegetarian/"> Zack Price, Why Vegetarian…</a></p>
<p>A Vegan Video from Dan Piraro<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/a-vegan-video-from-dan-piraro/"> A Vegan Video from Dan Piraro</a></p>
<p>The Pastures Aren’t So Green<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-pastures-arent-so-green/"> The Pastures Aren’t So Green</a></p>
<p>“Meet Your Meat” video<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/meet-your-meat-video/">“Meet Your Meat” video</a></p>
<p>The Meatrix II ½<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-meatrix-ii-%c2%bd/"> The Meatrix II ½</a></p>
<p>The Meatrix 2.5<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-meatrix-25/"> The Meatrix 2.5</a></p>
<p>The Original, The Meatrix<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/02242008/the-original-the-meatrix/"> The Original, The Meatrix</a></p>
<p>V Think— Essays,Thoughts, Ideas, Inspiration…<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05022008/v-think-essaysthoughts-ideas-inspiration/"> V Think— Essays,Thoughts, Ideas, Inspiration…</a></p>
<p>VeganTimes<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04292008/vegantimes/"> VeganTimes</a></p>
<p>The VEGAN Store<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06062008/the-vegan-store-2/"> The VEGAN Store</a></p>
<p>Sustainable living and “Realities”<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/09182007/sustainable-living-and-%e2%80%9crealities%e2%80%9d/"> Sustainable living and “Realities” </a></p>
<p>More Realities… Health, Health Care and the Business of Illness<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/09192007/more-realities%e2%80%a6-health-health-care-and-the-business-of-illness/"> More Realities… Health, Health Care and the Business of Illness</a></p>
<p>Starve or Feed,.. Easy choice,.. Simple Solution<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04152007/starve-or-feed-easy-choice-simple-solution/"> Starve or Feed,.. Easy choice,.. Simple Solution</a></p>
<p>GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) 100… GMOs as food homicide<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/04192007/gmos-genetically-modified-organisms-100-gmos-as-food-homicide/"> GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) 100… GMOs as food homicide</a></p>
<p>SUPPORT CLEAN FUEL<br />
<a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/05032008/support-clean-fuel/"> SUPPORT CLEAN FUEL</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a><br />
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</p>
<p>About the China Study and Professor Campbell:<br />
The message of the China Project is one of simplicity. You might say we are primarily interested in the symphony, secondarily interested in the individual musical notes. We believe the notes are most meaningful when perceived within the larger composition, especially when the symphony represents the very essence of our planetary well being. We must take more seriously the comprehensive effects of whole diets, rather than randomly tracking the misleading effects of individual nutrients and other odd chemicals. The time for making these linkages is now. The China Project data rigorously challenge many of our long-held nutritional assumptions and offer immense opportunities for improving our dietary habits on a global scale.<br />
T. Colin Campbell is a Co-Director of the Cornell-Oxford-China Diet and Health Project. He was trained at Cornell (M.S., Ph.D.) and MIT (Research Associate) in nutrition, biochemistry and toxicology. He presently holds the endowed chair of Jacob Gould Schurman Professor of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University.<br />
For full REFERENCES:<br />
www.NewCenturyNutrition.com<br />
About Dr. Campbell<br />
T. Colin Campbell, who is Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, has had a long career in research, teaching and development of national/international on diet, nutrition and health. His studies have ranged from work in the Philippines developing a nationwide program for feeding malnourished children to the organization and directorship of a nationwide study on diet, health and disease in the People&#8217;s Republic of China, commonly known as the China Study.<br />
Along the way he also managed a large laboratory based program of research on the basic biology of the relationship of diet with disease, especially concerning cancer. He has been a member of several expert committees that developed national and international policy on diet and cancer, food labeling, food safety issues and saccharin toxicity.<br />
He is probably best known for his work in the China Study and as Senior Science Advisor during the formative years of the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) and the World Cancer Research Fund. AICR awarded him the 1998 Lifetime Achievement Award in Cancer Research. Also, as a result of his work in China (the most comprehensive study on diet and disease ever conducted), he was recently named to the Board of Directors of a new government agency in China responsible for developing national diet and health research and education programs for the country.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/">Back to: Dr Billy Health .com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06072009/milk-math/">MILK MATH</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.drbillyhealth.com/06072009/milk-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
